Oh, hello there! Thanks for dropping by. I was seriously debating leaving that remark, as I really don't want to head straight into a round two of debate style mortal kombat, especially not on my puny phone, of all things. That and well, the Fed seems to treat the absence of feminist debaters in the topic as some triumphant sign that he's "won" It's more akin to all the kids leaving you alone in the sand box because they don't want to play with you. In reality, any serious attempt to engage ends up in a special pleading over definitions. Which, ironically is the same tactic creationists love to deploy. If I had a nickel for every time a young earther wanted to know or contested my definition of science...
Anyways, I do quite like him though. I really appreciate anyone that knows how to effectively and articulately communicate an anti-religious stance. You have to count your allies where you can find them, I guess. The good thing is, there's a movement known as atheism+ which acknowledges that atheists can also be misogynist and racist, and it's goal is to get them on board with social justice causes. PZ Meyers himself admits that there's a problem of sexism in the atheist community, and that became pretty apparent after the treatment of Rebecca Watson in the infamous elevator gate fiasco. Dawkin's said herding atheists is like herding cats, we're working on it, but it may take some time.
Oh goodness, you've got me rambling now. I'm a hot mess somedays, I swear. Thanks for the compliment on the username change too, by the way! I hope it enhances my super special snowflake cred here.
