No, you can't expect me not to think that. I eagerly await your explanation. And heh, you're almost certainly a better chess player than I am. =P
I don't think I mentioned metaphysics in that discussion, no. And I don't think I have toyed with any changes. The only time I mentioned epistemology specifically was to identify that as the field emawerna and I were arguing, and then to ask if he/she was satisfied with the conclusions we (kinda sorta) settled on. Perhaps I need to clarify, though - I never thought epistemology was impossible to do/understand, just that much of it was very difficult. I think it's very possible, which is one small reason I hold it as more important than metaphysics (to reference the conversation where, I believe, I inadvertently gave you the impression I thought epistemology impossible to understand).
Bon appetite, I guess, until next time!