While I was reading the perpetually incorrect atheist Richard Dawkins's (incorrect) book The Blind Watchmaker, I found a very interesting quote that I think you will like. To explain why he used only masculine pronouns in his book, he said,
"I am distressed to find that some women friends (fortunately not as many) treat the use of the impersonal masculine pronoun as if it showed intention to exclude them. If there were any excluding to be done (happily there isn't) I think it would sooner be men, but when I once tentatively tried referring to my abstract reader as 'she', a feminist denounced me for patronizing condescension: I ought to say 'he-or-she', and 'his-or-her'. That is easy to do if you don't care about language, but then if you don't care about language you don't deserve readers of either sex."
Hilarious, isn't it? I think you'll know why I thought of you when I read that. If you understand, please respond!