• We're currently experiencing a minor issue with our email system preventing emails for new registrations and verifications going out. We're currently working to fix this
  • Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
  • If you're still waiting for the e-mail, be sure to check your junk/spam e-mail folders

Search results

  1. A

    What qualities main characters need to have for you to consider them successful?

    Interesting character =/= commercially successful character They certainly never complicated the thing with plot either, but some people still seem to want one. It's the same with the dialogue. Of course it's a total pipe dream, but the point stands.
  2. A

    Ace Attorney/逆転裁判

    So the game wasn't as bad as I'd feared. A bit better than Dual Destinies.
  3. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    Well, excuse me for laughing at people's expense sometimes. Or do you take offence at the original argument or something? There are 4 billion women, and they disagree on things. They don't have a shared understanding of each other or a shared idea about what they should do.
  4. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    I'm sorry, but could you just dig through the thread? I already talked about those things a lot.
  5. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    Ad hominem is way too soft for this. This is plain lying. Admitted maybe a dozen times. You just don't want to quote them. Yeah, you never really point out where people have actually said these things. I sure wonder why...
  6. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    It's the reply of a man who actually bothered to read your posts. Reading comprehension, man. Letters, words, even full sentences! I know it's hard but try to focus. You said they are "one and the same," but being a woman obviously isn't enough to know how women should feel. Otherwise Sarah...
  7. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    "One and the same"? What does that even mean; that e.g. every woman is a moral authority on how women should feel? Like, Sarah Palin has special access to moral facts about how women should feel because she's a woman? Where even is this "should"? Facts are facts, they don't have any "should."...
  8. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    Kind of like many nihilists in human history? Better read up on the topic. So... we should take your emotional rants over empirical evidence? Sure, that's what being unbiased is all about! Dissolving identities is "talking down to people"? My apologies for having a radical feminist stance in...
  9. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    All the more reason to keep it simple. If I notice that the table in front of me is... well, a table, it would take some over-the-top hallucinations to throw me off. If I notice that women wear skirts more often than men, it only really demonstrates that I have functioning eyes and can do basic...
  10. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    I wasn't trying to analyze their experiences, I was analyzing reality... which doesn't depend on those experiences. I said "real-world implications" for a reason... This is also hilariously hypocritical because it's precisely why your long-distance psychoanalysis is ********. You don't know...
  11. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    Please. Everybody =/= you. The world doesn't revolve around you, or me for that matter. Because you insisted on arguing about it? Don't talk about voting systems if you don't want to talk about them. You presented whole armchair theories about stuff like "tactical voting isn't a thing" and...
  12. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    Who made you their spokesperson? Quotes please. I usually dissect the context a lot actually. What posts have you been reading? Give us detailed examples. Cheap mudslinging is easy, details are hard. In this case the distinction was apparently pretty substantial: So if you had a dozen qualified...
  13. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    You said the woman must be qualified, but you didn't say she must be the most qualified available. That's the difference. Well, wouldn't you agree that taking pride in gender is misguided and the source of many gender norms and stereotypes?
  14. A

    "Pocket Monsters Sun & Moon", starting November 17th

    I had a good, long laugh. The writers really outdid themselves this time.
  15. A

    Worst Moments of XY(&Z)

    Who's Clemont?
  16. A

    Worst Moments of XY(&Z)

    Whenever Ash appeared onscreen. Whenever Alain appeared onscreen. Whenever Sawyer appeared onscreen. Also Waifu Wars I guess.
  17. A

    Ace Attorney/逆転裁判

    Very low. Dual Destinies was lazy and bland already, and the incoming spirit trials don't sound very promising. Investigations 2 was the best game by a wide margin because it actually had a decently cohesive narrative and bothered to develop characters beyond one-note personalities.
  18. A

    Do you like this show?

    You should only watch this show for cheap laughs.
  19. A

    Favurite person that beat ash

    Trollbias, who else? He knows how the game is played. Alain is a typical edgy stoic nigh-invincible glorified character. But don't worry, he's a good person deep down because we can't have any moral controversy. Add in the blatant Charizard marketing and you get a character impossible to...
  20. A

    U.S. Politics 2017: So much for the tolerant SPPf

    I was paraphrasing. I can't exactly copypaste all the quotes here because it would make a wall of text, but here's the general idea. (I had given empirical examples on FPTP and proportional representation.) (You also said electoral college helps with local representation, while I said...
Top