Search results

I did do that, forgot to add that part in my previous message. But, I made sure to have it hold the Everstone, just like I did with Sandslash, Ninetales, and Golem (just to name a few) when I breed them. The only difference was, instead of the kanto persian being female like the others were...

No, not in UM/US. Unless the meowth/persian is a female kanto, it will always breed an alolan meowth. I have, sadly, experienced this first hand. I have a male kanto persian, breed it with a ditto, got alolan meowths. But, the other kanto variants, because I already had their female...

Nature does not matter to me, IVs do not matter, nothing matters other than it being a Kanto Meowth/Persian that is Female. Been having terrible luck in Omega Ruby in trying to find one. As long as you are not looking for any legendary/mythical pokemon (Phione is an exception), or specific...

So..basically the opposite of what serebii and other places are saying on the matter? Though, I did have a ditto holding an everstone (passing it's nature), and I still got the alolan meowth. I am beginning to believe the kanto pokemon does have to be female. Well, time to bust out omega ruby...

If that is the case, than, why does every other source I've read say otherwise? That you can use a male kanto pokemon with ditto? Even Serebii says this. Quoted from Serebii under the game mechanics for Breeding page: If you transfer original variants of the Pokémon and breed them in Sun &...

Yeah, cannot find any help anywhere, so, thought I'd ask around here. Trying to breed my kanto Persian to get a kanto meowth. Persian is male and is the Kanto version (came from Gen 6), equipped with an Everstone and is being breed with a Ditto. I did this with three other kanto pokemon that...

Offering the following Pokemon via Breeding with: (Either in the egg or hatched, your choice), no EV training, no leveling, no guarantees about nature, moves, or anything, just a fresh random level 1: Bulbasaur Chamander Squirtle Pidgey Rattata Spearow Ekans Pichu Sandshrew...

Not sure if this was pointed out or not...but...I found this: Error: Damage = ((((2 * 100 / 5 + 2) * 219 * 60 / 289) / 50) + 2) * 1.5 * 2 * 100 / 100 Damage = ((((42) * 219 * 60 / 289) / 50) + 2) * 1.5 * 2 Damage = (((1909.6) / 50) + 2) * 1.5 * 2 Damage = 44.9 Damage = ~45 In truth...