No, you can't nominate (or vote for) yourself. It puzzles me how this question comes up every time there are awards, as if the nomination process could possibly have any meaning whatsoever if people could go around nominating their own work. The distinction between who gets lots of nominations and who doesn't would just turn into who has the gall to openly nominate themselves for an award and who doesn't.
Is there a certain number of nominations needed to be on the list of possible winners?
If we want to write down who we thought got second place in a nomination, does that count for one of the five times that we are allowed to nominate an author for?
It has in past years.
Also, would it by any chance help at all to have a look at the way things worked last year? I ask just because some of the most recent set of questions can actually be answered by looking at what we used to do. (I don't mean to be blunt about it. Just saying Dragonfree's right that we get the "can you nominate yourself" question every year.) If so:
Planning thread to see what was suggested last year (and for an explanation of the rules if need be).
Nominations thread for a better understanding of how nominations work.
Voting thread if you happen to need an example of how voting works.
That said, I do believe that the discussion about the author/story limit left off at five per author. Which doesn't seem like a lot, but keep in mind we were running on a six per author limit last year, so... yeah. It's really not that bad.
I've seen the nomination thread. Which is where the second place things comes in. I didnt know if was just like a worthy mention or something.
Now, What about best reviewer? If that reviewer is an author, that takes a nomination, doesnt it?
Yeah, i thought about that after i posted it. The numbers confused me.If you were looking at my post and the posts following it, those aren't second places. Those are second nominations. You could nominate up to three stories/people/characters/what-have-you for each category, and each post that lists multiple such in categories the way I did weren't listing them in any particular order. Each of those nominees were seen as equally worthy of being contenders to those categories, and as such, they were in fact included on the ballot, even if they were nominated only by one person who listed them in the same category as two or three other [insert what-have-you here]. Make sense?
Gosh dang it.Yes. Most reviewers on this forum are also writers, so it's still pretty fair to count the reviewer categories as an author nomination.
Though I don't know how are the stories picked up to be rated, I don't know as to how my stories are going to fare to the others because something tells me that stories with little amount of views are NOT going to be picked up for examination to be nominated.
That said, I do believe that the discussion about the author/story limit left off at five per author. Which doesn't seem like a lot, but keep in mind we were running on a six per author limit last year, so... yeah. It's really not that bad.
What a sip to be a stowaway on... Ah, yes.The S.S. Slowbro (which, by the way, I found to be a pretty fitting name for this ship) wasn’t exactly first-class travel. Well, at least, the way I was traveling wasn’t.
What an opening. Haha.My name is Skull.