By the way what in the hell is league's problem with disqualifying people who don't show up. No, no, let's NOT go look for the person, god forbid a trainer that doesn't show up, isn't being held up by an angry drunk individual with a knife to his/her throat.
This happened as well in the Kanto league, and yet the reason for that was Team Rocket's fault. I don't understand why people are getting close to being disqualified for things OUTSIDE of their own control. I think that's incredibly unfair and a disservice to the entire competition. Because enough people could hire a lot of people and many people can be disqualified unfairly INTENTIONALLY upsetting the entire nature of the league, and making the league having a FORCED outcome. Why battle, when you can hire a bunch of thugs to distract your opponent LONG enough to disqualify.
That wasn't the case here, but it's very seedy that the league would even allow such a thing to happen because of their strict rules. I mean with the whole Team Rocket thing in Kanto, and the stupid thing was NO ONE BOTHERED TO LOOK FOR ASH.....well okay maybe I'm not remembering correctly and Misty and Brock did look, but you would think there would've been surveillance of Team Rocket stealing Ash's Pokemon to allow that the battle be postponed until Ash could resolve his issue with Team Rocket, as the league were VERY aware of Team Rocket at THAT time.
What? No Welfare Check before you disqualify a trainer or maybe see why they're not showing up?
Because if the league worked on disqualifying trainers on not showing up. Then explain to me why someone can't be hired to manipulate the battles in such a fashion?
Like for the finals, why doesn't Ash hire a powerful bad person and have them tranquilize Alain for a few hours and have him be disqualified for not showing up and Ash wins by default. OKAY bad example, Ash wouldn't do that.
OR Team Rocket tranquilizing Ash for a few hours allowing Alain to win.
There are seriously NO checks or balances at all in regards to this.
That was bad.
Not a single individual good battle. Everything got one-shotted with bad animation, which is something Best Wishes would serve us and not XY. What's the point of a 3 vs 3 first round if there's nothing to show?
At least the battlefields are interesting... if they utilize them.
Agreed, they could've been 1 vs 1 matches and served the SAME purpose. But I guess 64 trainers necessitated 3 on 3 battles though maybe the 3 on 3 battles were to serve the purpose of the Furfrou trainer allowing Ash to battle.
*sigh* What was the point of Y? Did it'd appearance really add anything? Was it really necessary to put in when it and Trevor were just going to get horribly slaughtered? It just seemed so pointless to me. Do the writers really hate Y so much that it had to get jobbed so badly by it's already ridiculously over loved counterpart? I mean, say what you will about Lucario, but at least it didn't slaughter Zoroark or something (instead, it got slaughtered by X, yay).
As for the battles, rushed as all hell. What a disappointing start to the league. I can understand putting their focus on the bigger battles, but even so, they can do a lot better with the lead-up to said battles then just a KO fest. Hopefully next week is better, but my expectations are definitely lowered now.
If Alain's Charizard used Thunderpunch on Mega Charizard Y, I would've had less of a problem of Charizard sweeping. But REALLY? Flamethrower ONE SHOTTING MEGA Charizard Y a Pokemon that has a fairly HIGH special defense stat in comparison to Mega Charizard X's special attack stat that it should NOT have been one shotted at least not with a very not effective move. Less so than a flamethrower on Mega Charizard X, but still even so, Charizard Y resists it.