I am however afraid that the Heinz dilemma is a debate about consequentialism and deontology whether you are aware of it or not.
As for I simplify the problem too much? It is quite the contrary. Rather I am looking at the example from a broader perspective. As somebody mentioned before, it is utterly stupid to bicker about one scenario. What nobody here seems to be understanding is how the scenario relates to ethics on a whole. Nobody seems to be seeing the big picture (or perhaps they are but you are preventing discussion on the matter).
And you are unwise to think that the question 'do the ends justify the means' is a simple one. It is anything but simple, and of course includes a 'why' in there that you seem to believe does not exist.
That is irrelevant. It makes no difference to the outcome whether the action has been done and whether it was the right decision to whether to action would be the right decision.
I was never trying to hi-jack your thread, and you should have understood that. I was only ever trying to improve the quality of the debate.
As for now, I shall not be posting again unless I should feel the need to defend my own (as I feel now).
As I understand it, consequentialism vs. deontology is only one of the four most basic themes of ethics, so I would consider it a simple debate, in that it limits the debate to only one theme. The debate I suggest includes several themes, including what moral guidelines make something right and wrong (i.e. objective, subjective, relative), whether or not rules should be followed without exception or based on situation, and whether or not good and bad are related to the group or the individual.
And, yes, the Heinz dilemma itself includes that as a PART of the solution, but that is not, by any means, all there is to this debate. In order to successfully debate this, you need to broaden the topic, because essentially, all that deontology vs. consequentialism (or utilitarianism or egoism for that matter) solves is whether or not we can say stage 6 (or 5 or 1&2 respectively) is as good as the others.
Last edited: