OK so what about feminists who are pro-life? where do they fit in? If you think pro-life=anti-women that would mean a pro-life feminist would be an anti-women feminist. It doesn't make much sense that does it. Using the whole you're against abortion means you hate women is a very lame argument to use in the abortion debate since it doesn't take in the factor of what a pro-life person does in life and how much respect and care they give to people.
I think I may have to edit the rules of this debate, Pro-life being called anti-women is going too far, and can easily be seen/used as flamebaiting/trolling. I might also have to edit the rules to ask people to back up their claims with evidence if they want to make any claims that are expressed as facts. I find the trend of people posting their opinions as statements of fact, but with no evidence to back it up vexing.
Well if you believe that it is OK as you say to "discard" people who suffer from severe mental retardation would that not be discrimination? Isn't society not trying to teach people to treat each other no matter how different with respect? So to have an abortion simply because child born would suffer from severe mental retardation not be the same as discriminating against a person who suffers from retardation?
One of the pro-choice issues is 'what is sentience'? Intelligence that only humans possess come into play. Also, if you want a REALLY extreme example of 'severe mental retardation', anencephaly is it. I mentioned that particularly disability due to how severely it limits/destroys intelligence. I've tried asking Marioguy to qualify what he meant by 'severe'. If someone is a vegetable, there is a question raised over whether they'd have the intelligence to be a 'sentient being', and hence a person with the rights that come with being one. That is the major pro-choice issue Marioguy seems to be driving at.
Many pro-choice arguments centre around human intelligence, whether people disabled enough would have it or not, not just age of gestation. There are even scientists who would advocate 'post-birth abortion' as the baby is not intelligent enough to be classified as a person, in their opinion.
However, the truth is, nobody knows what a sentient being is, so my main pro-life argument falls in line with my opinion, assign personhood at conception and keep it there. Let's NOT play God and risk getting it wrong with millions of deaths is what I think.