1. We have moved to a new forum system. All your posts and data should have transferred over. Welcome, to the new Serebii Forums. Details here
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
    Dismiss Notice
  3. If you're still waiting for the e-mail, be sure to check your junk/spam e-mail folders
    Dismiss Notice

American Gun Control

Discussion in 'Debate Forum' started by chess-z, Oct 3, 2017.

  1. Achantion

    Achantion Ice Type Enthousiastic

    I know this feeling all to well. I've lived my entire life in a country were barely anyone has a gun, and everything is fine, I can't see a single reason why anyone should ever need to own a gun (especially if nobody has them), I gave up on most of these discussions a long time ago, I'm convinced it is a cultural thing, driven by fear-mongering.

    We as a human are inherently to emotional to for such things.
    WishIhadaManafi5 likes this.
  2. BronzeHeart92

    BronzeHeart92 Active Member

    True. Whatever 'boogeymen' these pro-gun people fear above all else, they likely only exist inside their heads...
  3. WishIhadaManafi5

    WishIhadaManafi5 To Boldly Go Where No One Has Gone Before. Staff Member Moderator

    Yep. That said, I'm not against people having guns to go hunting with. My uncle had them to use for deer hunting. But at least he believed in some kind of gun control and not having military grade weapons and tons of ammunition.
  4. D*N

    D*N Musical Star

    This debate is always so weird to me as someone from Europe. I don't even know why you would like other people to have a gun at any time. I don't even trust myself with a gun, let alone other people.
  5. SBaby

    SBaby Dungeon Master

    This is happening right now, and will likely continue to happen until the end of the world.

    Socialism is great, until the government runs out of other peoples' money.

    The government is what people fear. And nowadays, it's easier and easier to see why.

    But the thing is, it doesn't matter if guns exist or not. People who want to kill will find a way to do it with or without guns (there'll just be more IEDs or stabbings). The crusades are considered the bloodiest war in human history, and I don't think anyone had ARs during those wars.

    But hey, people also kill other people with vehicles. Maybe we should outlaw those too. And the Internet has caused kids to commit suicide. Maybe that should be outlawed too. Anything can be a gun. Firearms are just a red herring.

    Not to mention, let's pretend for a second you're somehow able to get firearms outlawed (which would require Republicans and Democrats to work together, and good luck with that). What do you think would happen? The cartels will see that and instead of smuggling in drugs, they'll smuggle in firearms. You can't get rid of firearms any more than you could stop every person in the world from committing a crime for a week.

    And before you ask, I don't own any firearms. Too loud.
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2019
    TheWanderingMist and Torpoleon like this.
  6. Auraninja

    Auraninja Try to understand.

    Should we have a system where the government takes more of the money for themselves, then?

    I'm sure crusaders also didn't have nuclear weapons or missiles, but that shouldn't take out any emphasis on how dangerous those are.

    Vehicles are for transportation. The Internet is for information gathering and socialization. What is a firearm designed to do?

    And before I go further; let me say that I'm not opposed to all fire arms, but I don't think an automatic rifle should be in the hands of the public.
    I don't see the problem with controlling the arms.

    As opposed to now where it is legal to purchase a fire arm, and you don't have to even be mentally competent to own one.

    Also, look up mass shootings in each first world country.
    WishIhadaManafi5 likes this.
  7. bobjr

    bobjr It's Fusion, I don't have to expalin it. Staff Member Moderator

    I never got the "Socialism takes all your money" when in our increasingly capitalistic society the wealth gap is rising more and more and currently the average American can't even get 1000 dollars in emergency money.

    Either way the problem is we've seen local solutions fail because no matter what it has to be a strong national push. If one state does a lot of work and the other does nothing then yeah state borders are hardly watched, which is the real problem with places like Chicago, when Indiana is right there.
  8. SBaby

    SBaby Dungeon Master

    That's what Socialism is. Once they run out of other peoples' money, then you have a third world country.

    Who do you think would illegally buy firearms if they get outright outlawed? Not law abiding citizens. It's going to be people that have the intent to use them on someone else.

    As I've said before, the only way systems like these work is if everyone in the nation agrees to never commit a crime again.
    TheWanderingMist and Torpoleon like this.
  9. Auraninja

    Auraninja Try to understand.

    When the Republican controlled Senate took out people's healthcare, they celebrated. Why did they celebrate? It was because of the tax breaks they would get.
    Capitalism, if not checked, can lead to greed and selfishness, and that just means that corporations and politicians who support them get more money.

    If our society is not even trying to forbid crazy people from owning guns, then we are asking to have major problems.

    Let's say that a person who is crazy brings a gun to a place that allows it. He isn't breaking the law until he or she fires.
    You see, if you can make it illegal for him to own the gun in the first place, then you can make preventative measures.

    But let's not get too theoretical, let's look at Japan.

    While Japan is far from perfect, they create extensive tests to see if you are competent enough to own a gun.
    Japan has its fair share of problems, but they hardly have any gun deaths.
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2019
    WishIhadaManafi5 likes this.
  10. SBaby

    SBaby Dungeon Master

    True, but Japan also has a society where people have way more respect for authority than the US does. In the US, we have groups of people that literally want to wage wars against law enforcement. How can we possibly expect crime to stop with attitudes like that? If you take guns off the street, you also have to take crime off the street. And the only way to do that is to change the culture.
  11. bobjr

    bobjr It's Fusion, I don't have to expalin it. Staff Member Moderator

    You’re right law enforcement does need a huge culture change.

    (Also the huge white supremacy problem that ties heavily into law enforcement)
  12. FullFathomsFive

    FullFathomsFive Well-Known Member

    I'm literally a paid-up Conservative, and I think you'd have to turn a deliberate blind eye to not see something desperately wrong with US policing attitudes, or at the very least what officers are being taught. There are far too many videos out there of terrified officers gunning down innocent people, and even if there's wider reciprocal problems the onus is absolutely on the police to be the most responsible and proportionate party in any interaction.
  13. TheWanderingMist

    TheWanderingMist Samayo Kiri, Keeper of the Gates Ethereal

    I'm all for better background checks, but if you think banning guns is going to solve anything, you're incorrect. Both the Walmart in El Paso and the bar in Dayton were gun-free zones. If we use the outright banning side's own logic, they should be against anyone owning knives after the attack that left 4 dead and 2 or more wounded in California.

    Everyone screams about mass shootings, but that's only because they get media attention, and even then, it's only when it happens during daylight. Gang shootings rarely get media attention outside of their local cities. If I'm remembering correctly, 67% of all gun deaths in the US are suicides. The odds of you being shot in a mass shooting vs the odds of you committing suicide are essentially the same as the odds of you dying in a plane crash vs the odds of you dying in a car crash. One is scarier than the other, but far less likely to happen.

    And as @SBaby said, if you outlaw firearms, which are far more valuable than most drugs, the gangs and the cartels will start mass-producing them, and they'll hand them out to anybody who wants them.

    As for the "military-grade" and "tons of ammunition" being illegal argument, shooters will just start working around them by carrying multiple guns so they can drop one as soon as it runs out of bullets and start shooting again without even having to reload.

    I don't own a gun at the moment, but I have considered getting one for self-defense.
  14. bobjr

    bobjr It's Fusion, I don't have to expalin it. Staff Member Moderator

    Gun bans don’t work if you only do one area, it has to be nationwide. One state can put in strict gun laws, but that doesn’t matter if a state an hour away has none.

    Also carrying a gun for see defense increases your odds of being shot.
  15. FullFathomsFive

    FullFathomsFive Well-Known Member

    There's a severe difference in lethality between guns and knives, and knives have many more legitimate purposes.

    I don't see the point of the comparison here. Gun massacres are infrequent, but the issue is that they happen at all!

    International comparisons suggest the ease of access and sheer saturation of guns is almost certainly the root cause of the US's borderline unique problem. My only hesitation over new laws that would eventually escalate to a full ban would be the nightmare of implementation.

Share This Page