Do you think Klansmen should be flayed? Maybe they'll realize that skin color doesn't matter if they don't have skin.
I'd prefer Vlad the Impaler's method. After all, that's how he handled secretive groups conspiring against his government.
Do you think Klansmen should be flayed? Maybe they'll realize that skin color doesn't matter if they don't have skin.
I'd prefer Vlad the Impaler's method. After all, that's how he handled secretive groups conspiring against his government.
also, on a not serious note: Shame and humility? In my Jontron? More unlikely than you think!
(If anyone gets that reference you get an internet cookie)
Start of thread: 'Antifa has no problem with violence, it's all made up, cherry syrup etc etc etc'
This flaming wreckage: 'Murder and torture are a-ok, you guys'
And so many of you seemed to wonder why I'm anti-political mob violence. These strange people have managed to get themselves this wound up on a Pokémon forum.
Nah. The violent minority can take responsibility for their thuggery. It just highlights what utter cretins they are if they're so stupid they don't know how to intellectually combat Nazism.
And then when people "Jumped down your throat" you quoted Teshun or whatever his name is, agreeing with his more nuanced position that the violence from both parties is not equal and should be used as a last resort.
Here's a list of things that can all be true:
- Nazism is the most repugnant ideology on the face of the Earth.
- Neo-Nazi and far-right movements have an alarming tendency towards violence and intimidation.
- The broad stated aims of white supremacy and the Antifa movement are not morally equitable.
- There is no monopoly on opposition to Nazism and it has been combatted by many ordinary and extraordinary people from across the political spectrum throughout history.
- The Antifa movement also has an alarming tendency towards violence and intimidation, though on a lesser scale.
- Many Antifa members are far too comfortable with the notion of political violence even if they are nonviolent themselves (see the 'punch a Nazi' trope).
- Innocent bystanders and journalists have been attacked at Antifa events by activists.
- Nonviolent Nazis and white supremacists should have the right to advocate their views without fear for their own safety.
- Anyone who feels the need to use violence against a nonviolent Nazi is openly advertising the fact that they are a glue-eating chimp without the faculties to intellectually challenge Nazism.
Not a mote of contradiction in any of that. Opposition to Nazism is such an easy, such a fundamentally human thing to do, that we should all be able to expect much, much better from this movement.
And that would be real interesting, if that was the argument being put forward. If you were being intellectually honest, you'd recap the fact that the OP's argument revolved around a flat denial that Antifa had any problems with violence at all (they do) and that they had ever laid a finger on anyone other than a card-carrying white supremacist (they have). The thread title's a misnomer - this didn't start as an attempt to deny equivalence, this was an attempt to whitewash a flawed movement.
- Anyone who feels the need to use violence against a nonviolent Nazi is openly advertising the fact that they are a glue-eating chimp without the faculties to intellectually challenge Nazism.
You were addressing my argument, not the OP's. You changed your argument from a snobbish "Only idiots/thugs can't challenge Nazism intellectually." to agreeing that violence can be used in limited circumstances.
Outside of self-defense, there is literally no reason to punch a Nazi/Klansman.
Seriously, you've been stroking yourself this entire discussion and it's annoying as hell. It isn't immaturity to call it out.
I don't get that reference. Does that mean JonTron has no shame or humility? I'm really saddened that the GameGrumps haven't called him out on being a racist pos.