Arceus end all

[ShinyPichu4Ever]

That's not a good reason. I don't see why every Pokemon needs to have an evolution.

well it's more likely. If you didn't notice they made Sudowoodo have a preevolution when it didn't need one. They also made Porygon have 2 evolutions that it didn't need as it started off as a non-evolution pokemon. Same with Tangela.

 

[Dattebayo]

That's not a good reason. I don't see why every Pokemon needs to have an evolution.

Because eveyone's underestimating the power of Stand Alone Pokemon.

 

[ShinyPichu4Ever]

Because eveyone's underestimating the power of Stand Alone Pokemon.

you're quite right. I liked Sudowoodo, Snorlax, Chansey, and all the other Stand Alone pokemon a lot more than once they got evolutions. I think Mr.Mime shouldn't have gotten a prevolution

 

[elephantdog]

First because Ledian and Ariados are evolutions of Ledyba and Spinarak and second because Zangoose and Seviper don't have evolutions yet

But why those specifically and not others that don't have evolutions?

 

[AZIIKO4876]

This is Forbidden!!!!!!!!!

and yet so many respond.

interesting is it not.

not.....

 

[Skaisdead]

I like how everyone in this thread appears to have missed BVCM's obvious sarcasm.

 

[Typhlosion Trainer]

Arceus does not end it all, the franchise will keep going.

 

[Chim-Charred!]

Maybe an anti-christ type Pokemon. Arceus's yang to his yin. That sort of thing. If Arceus is Alpha then their shoud be an Omega. After that I got nothing else. It still kind of seems like they would be unnaturally prolonging the series that way but whatever. Money makes the word go round!

Edit: An evolution for Arceus could also work well! I hadn't thought of that.

 

[BCVM22]

What is it about any part of the franchise that makes you think a Pokémon representing the death of everything would be a feasible introduction?

 

[Will-powered Spriter]

Maybe an anti-christ type Pokemon. Arceus's yang to his yin. That sort of thing. If Arceus is Alpha then their shoud be an Omega. After that I got nothing else. It still kind of seems like they would be unnaturally prolonging the series that way but whatever. Money makes the word go round!

Edit: An evolution for Arceus could also work well! I hadn't thought of that.

The series gets enough flak as it is for being evil, demonic etc. without it actually becoming so.

An evolution for Arceus would be a game breaker. 150 in every stat? 255 in every stat? Wouldn't work.

 

[surfer treecko]

Maybe an anti-christ type Pokemon.

Someone already suggested an internet pokemon.

 

[rocky505]

maybe they could do gods of certain types like a god of fire, water or anything else.

 

[Tropios]

does the next legendaries need to be stronger? ive heard the arceus thing plenty of times but i dont see a point of it.


btw, why wouldnt pokemon need evos? i dont care about their stats and evs and if they look bad it doesnt matter to me

 

[AZIIKO4876]

What is it about any part of the franchise that makes you think a Pokémon representing the death of everything would be a feasible introduction?

"Pokemon Emo Version"

 

[Ohshi]

The creator of Arceus? Or the different "Poke gods" of other universes? lol

 

[BlitzBlast]

I really do not understand this fascination with calling one of the newest legendaries of each gen God.

First it was Mew. Then Ho-oh. Then.. okay, 3rd gen didn't have anybody. But now we have Arceus, and "Arceus = God" threads are popping up faster then rabbits.

 

[Legerdemain]

Well.
If Arceus = God, then 5th generation would have to introduce a counterpart.

With God, there is the Devil, so there must be something to counterbalance it.

Instead of the Pokemon of creation, perhaps the Pokemon of destruction.

That'd be an interesting movie actually... war between Arceus and XXX Pokemon

 

[BCVM22]

If Arceus = God, then 5th generation would have to introduce a counterpart.

Good thing Arceus isn't God, so there goes that inane "requirement."

With God, there is the Devil, so there must be something to counterbalance it.

See above.

Instead of the Pokemon of creation, perhaps the Pokemon of destruction.

For the love of--

have you people been playing a different franchise for the last thirteen years? What is it about any part of anything with the name "Pokémon" plastered across the front that makes you think "hey, the concept of a Pokémon destined to destroy and kill everything is a really feasible and realistic idea!"?

Please. Stop.

 

[Auraninja]

Well.
If Arceus = God, then 5th generation would have to introduce a counterpart.

With God, there is the Devil, so there must be something to counterbalance it.

Instead of the Pokemon of creation, perhaps the Pokemon of destruction.

That'd be an interesting movie actually... war between Arceus and XXX Pokemon

Well, I believe in a god but no devil, so what do you have to say about that? Besides, I doubt they would make a Pokemon that evil.

Also, what is etched in stone saying that because Arceus has a deity-like(not a god) status, the next Pokemon would have to be as strong or stronger?

 

[halloweenghost]

been stated many times there is no such thing as an evil pokemon most of them fight because of territory and such.