If the situation has nothing to do with a person, and doesn't affect that person in any way at all, and that person snitches, that person is a nosy little prick who should be shot.
Murder is the only exception.
Each person has a responsibility to primarily do no harm and ultimately promote the good. In any situation where someone is consciously upending that responsibility, it inherently becomes the responsiblity of others to act in a way that fulfills this moral obligation. No person deserves to be harmed or killed for acting morally.
Wait. So I'm a jackass for wanting people who don't know how to mind their own business to get their asses kicked like THEY deserve?
I thought it was the other way around, but OKAY.
Maybe the 'moron' didn't know there was some fucking dumbass snitcher nearby, and was just doing what they want. I mean there can't be that many in the world. Poor 'moron.'
See piekid's murder exception above. I'm sure you don't really think that a snitch who stops a murder from occuring deserves to get his rump wrecked, Kit Kat, and that's the sort of thing HoennMaster was replying to.
In any case, if a snitch deserves to be hurt for trying to set moral accounts straight, how much pain, proportionately, does the person doing something wrong and getting snitched on deserve? It must be tons. Regardless of whether one is snitched on, found out legitimately by a concerned party, or not discovered in any way at all, doing something you oughtn't be doing renders you accountable for doing it. Any realized potential consequences that follow directly from misbehavior are fully, fairly earned consequences. Transfer of the blame is abhorrent.
It would conceivably be wiser to limit the amount of wrongdoing across all fields, which would begin with the person doing something inappropriate to, quite simply, not do it in the first place.
Get out of here...
Silly example. Four friends, A B C D. Friend C and D are dating, and friend C is best friends with friend B. C cheats on D with B. B tells A and A tells D. Is A a snitch or is A a good friend?
Shades of gray. In cases of mediation like this, the first option is always to give person C every chance, suggestion, poke, prod, and persuasion to come clean to person D of their own accord. Only if person C has no intention of being honest (in a responsibly timely manner) does person A need to tell person D the truth.