Sneasel the Weasel
Member
Share your opinions.
"I think its pretty bad."
Share your opinions.
fire red and leaf green were worse. strictly keeping all pokemon introduced after gen 1 locked in the post game was awful. the sevi islands are overrated in my opinion, extra content is appreciated but the constant need for HMs was a turn off.
You are right, i really did dislike playing with a joy con, it's the main reason why i have not been able to bring myself to finish another playthrough of let's go pikachu. i guess if i really think about it, i do have to agree that fire red was more fun to play despite the additional features (and in spite of removed features) in let's go. i forgot how frustrating my experience with let's go was and instead was only remembering the graphics rather than the gameplay. hehe, i really don't know if i can finish that game a second time unless i was playing with someone.FRLG having HMs is strictly a product of its time. SM was the clear delineator for HMs, every game before it had HMs and every game after it did not have HMs (usually having Ride Pokemon of some kind). If FRLG was made after SM, it would not have HMs and then what would be the issue with the Sevii Islands?
I honestly don't know how you can say FRLG is worse than LGPE though. FRLG may have locked Pokemon outside of Gen 1 until the post game, but LGPE locked Pokemon outside of Gen 1 from the entire game. And even if you think the Sevii Islands are overrated, are they really any worse than LGPE not having any additional post game areas (besides Cerulean Cave that existed in the originals) or pretty much any post game content aside from Master Trainers?
I could see FRLG being worse than BDSP, but not worst overall. I can think of multiple games worse than FRLG.
Nah, my farts are way worse imo.Nah, XY are way worse imo
LGPE were the worst because they stripped away everything that made the series great and tried to be a much worse console version of Go. Gameplay is extremely boring after you catch Mewtwo, the Master trainers were just horrible as the post game as you could only use one specific Pokémon at a certain level in a battle with Ditto being the exception but even if you had a high enough Pokémon, the AI still finds a way to be extremely cheap (who the heck keeps a Pidgey completely unevolved to get it at a high level?), and the co op was extremely broken when facing Gym Leaders and the E4. I got bored with these games about three months after release and I traded them in at GameStop which I regret only a tiny bit because I forgot to take the Pokéball Controller Mew out of my party and into a Box to transfer it into Home and SwSh/BDSP and I really don’t want to buy another copy just to get it. The rest of the Pokémon I don’t care about as I got my Shiny Melmetal from Go in my main Sw game and nothing of great value other than Mew is left in the save for Eevee.
After that I’d say RBG are the second worst only because they don’t hold up very well these days as FRLG made Kanto much better in so many ways and the Gen I games are full of so many bugs and glitches that it is really easy to ruin a game file by mistake.
"I think its pretty bad."
The bugs and glitches I’ll give the programmers a pass as they are easy to patch out with a few updates. The Gen I games are sort of bad in terms of glitches. I mean there’s the infamous MissinNo glitch that can corrupt your entire game, Glitch City which can softlock your game, Focus Energy did the opposite of what it was supposed to do, and the fact that Ghost types couldn’t damage Psychic Pokémon despite in game text saying that Ghosts are Super Effective against Psychic Pokémon.A fun nostalgia romp but not a game I will ever play again tbh, if I ever wanna play Sinnoh again it will be base games.
Worst pokemon game though? Probably up there since it was a 1:1 remake all the work was done for Ilca, yet the game was full of bugs and glitches.