• Hi all
    Just a notice, we recently discovered that someone got into a moderator account and started hard deleting a load of key and legacy threads...around 150 threads have been lost dating back to 2007 and some weeks ago so we can't roll the forums back.
    Luckily no personal data could be accessed by this moderator, and we've altered the permissions so hard deleting isn't possible in the future
    Sorry for any inconvenience with this and sorry for any lost posts.
  • Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
  • If you're still waiting for the e-mail, be sure to check your junk/spam e-mail folders

BECAUSE THE BIBLE SAYS SO!! Does the Bible have a legitimate place in modern debate?

Does the Bible have a legitimate place in modern debates when it has something to say

  • Total voters
    361
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ohshi

Ohshi

Banned from Club Penguin
I may be religious and all, but you clearly cannot use the bible as support for a debate. What proof or credibility does it have? It simply has stories that Christianity believes in. That's it.
 
D

Dunning

God's Soldier
My proof of God is mostly personal experiences, but here is a link on someone who did it in a way made more to be a proof
Link One
Link Two
if I copied down the wrong URL tell me, but I am pretty sure I didnt, I will double check when I am less tired, sounds like this debate is winding down though
 
E

ebilly99

Americanreigon champ
Dunning said:
My proof of God is mostly personal experiences, but here is a link on someone who did it in a way made more to be a proof
Link One
Link Two
if I copied down the wrong URL tell me, but I am pretty sure I didnt, I will double check when I am less tired, sounds like this debate is winding down though
Click to expand...

Yeah really a lot of talking to explain nothing. Oh miracles so far back they can't be proven and historical evidence. (No duh it was written a long time ago)
 
P

Profesco

gone gently
I think this thread is winding down, too. With TheFightingPikachu so infrequent a participant, mattj is the only one to raise a sustained defense of his thesis, and it seems to be unanimously recognized that his debating methods are not conducive to helpful discussion - and the responses to him are not much more helpful, either. On top of that, it seems both sides raise questions that go unsatisfactorily answered according to some point of view or other, and we are not getting anywhere.

Dunning is a welcome new addition, but I have to agree that the content of the discussions with him is his personal Christian faith rather than the merits or justifications of the Bible itself.

And a final note: this thread has been a breeding ground for infractions because of the way some of the major players interact here. I'm just not interested in keeping up that amount of policing for a thread that isn't really working out well anyway. It's not cost-effective, imo.

Maybe we'll have another big Christianity-related debate after this, but in the meantime let's take a breather.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top