It's also just as easy to argue the other view. Depending on what you want to get out of the game, cheating or hacking may or may not seem reasonable to you. Personally if I spend £30 on a game I want to get as much as I can out of it, so I put time and effort into completing the game and don't try and take short-cuts by having infinite rare candies. I did that in my Blue game, and beating another player with a lv.100 charizard that I didn't even train isn't nearly as satisfying as beating other players with lv. 70-odd pokémon that I put time into levelling up. I could care less about the unlockable pokémon in the game, and to be honest I'm enjoying Diamond and Pearl just fine without Arceus and Shaymin. I did buy an AR a couple of years ago to unlock Lugia and Ho-Oh in FR, but ended up not using it as I didn't care about it enough to track down the exact code to activate the ticket. If you don't agree, then that's just the way you play. If you want the unlockables that badly, or want shinies, or to cut down on hatching time, or get mutliple tms, and are prepared to invest in a cheating device to get them, it's your call and there's certainly nothing stopping you. I personally don't see the point in hacking pokémon with perfect IVs, EVs and unusual movesets and that's where I'd draw the line, but if you really want to and have the facilities to do so, then it's your game. Just don't talk about it on the forums because, as you know, the policy's strictly anti-hacking.
This is my point of view:
- Yes, it is unreasonable to hack a game you just started playing. Not to mention it shows laziness.
- But it is OKAY to hack once you've completed the game. I say, you finished it fairly, so go knock yourself out and screw around with it a little if you want to.
- In my opinion, those rare pokemon like shaymin and darkrai are worthless to me if hacked. But that may be a different story to those who really hack.
- As for hacking items, for me, it's okay too. I don't see anything wrong with it. The only difference is effort spent.
- Same with EV training and IV breeding. Of course, there's a line drawn here. Even hackers have some sort of "ethics". Some keep their hacks within legal standards, meaning, they only put in 2 or 3 stats at 31 IVs and make the EV spread just as fair as one that is manually trained. And as I said previously, the difference then lies in effort spent.
- Now if we're talking idiots who hack their Pokemon with 31 IVs all the way with 255 EVs in everything or a Wondertomb with 999 in all stats or exploding Magikarps, THAT is a different story. Battles are not fair this way.
Personally, I don't hack, but I do ask for "legal hacks". I don't have an AR. But I do have a lot of TMs thanks to my cousin all the way in the States who has it (after I bought and finished the game there, he just hacked me all the TMs >.<).
Anti-hackers have a good argument when they talk about effort spent in breeding and EV training. I understand that one very well. I EV train and I breed. It's tedious. Sometimes I find it fun, sometimes I don't. Now those anti-hackers who give reasons like "hacked Pokemon will always win! It's unfair!" or "hacking ruins your game!" are pathetic. I have all TMs on my game and my game is not ruined. Hacked Pokemon will always win if you battled an idiot for a hacker. Otherwise, you won't even notice the difference (which is kinda sad on the ethical hacker's part because he gets blamed for making Wondertombs when he really doesn't).
Now, good hackers have a good argument as well, when they say they don't have time. Not everybody has the same schedule and just because one person can make time doesn't mean another can do it too. I make time to breed and train my Pokemon, but if I am in a hurry, I ask for legal hacks online.
Bottomline, anti-hackers shouldn't judge hackers blindly. Not all hackers are the same. There are unethical hackers and there are also ethical ones. Most anti-hackers complain about those unethical hackers and judge hackers as a whole which is a complete logical fallacy.