Ash still used a third regardless, still was used. Contribution or worth aside it was used. Ash is going to win because he's the MC obviously. So your argument that the battle would have been a forgone conclusion surely without the bird doesn't have a leg to stand on, assuming the plot wasn't working for him having a numbers advantage against a gym leader can't be overlooked. It is double-standards, because trust me if another character battled a gym leader and won with a numbers advantage then they would get so much hate.
You're basing a part of your statement - "
because trust me if another character battled a gym leader and won with a numbers advantage then they would get so much hate" - off things that haven't even happened, and my argument is the one that doesn't have a leg to stand on?
Just as I criticize the Roxie battle because Ash had a ridiculously high numbers advantage (6-3), I've continued to criticize the Grant battle on the same thing - because Ash had a numbers advantage that should never have been given to him. If you actually read everything I wrote on the subject in both threads, you'd know that. So your claim for double standards, at least as far as I'm concerned, is absolutely untrue.
But I
also criticize Ash vs. Roxie because the way the entire battle (where the numbers advantage was only a part of it, albeit not a small one) was executed made it come off less like Ash achieved anything on his own and more like Roxie did everything she reasonably could to help him (e.g. giving him a berry to heal one of his his Pokemon during the battle) short of just giving him the Badge. I do praise Ash vs. Grant for executing Ash's ultimate triumph well - by having Ash make good use of his Pikachu's strengths to beat Tyrunt, and not doing things like having Grant take any major step to save Ash from defeat, like healing his Pokemon mid-battle -
despite of the numbers advantage, which I didn't feel the Roxie battle did. You can in favor of Roxie's battle (or against Grant's) if you want, but if you're saying that the claim itself is a double standard - when I've already explained what I think separates the two in their execution - then I'd have to question if you even know how double standards work.
I never said Ash didn't use Fletchling, or that it didn't make any contribution towards the battle. And using the excuse of the plot is a terrible argument to make because that same plot has worked for
and against Ash, as well as everybody else. Before you criticize my argument, how about actually reading all of it instead of arguing claims I've never made?
Next thing you know Ash is gonna be given pity badges and fans will defend it as being okay because he helped out against Team Flare or something.
First off, that's not even true. While I'm sure there are those who would defend - just as there are fans who do their hardest to excuse the worst traits of any character - there are also people who have criticized Ash's actual pity badges, where he never actually defeated the Gym Leader, in Kanto (or against Pryce, Wattson, and Maylene.). I'm one of them.
Second, if your argument hinges on speculation (which this statement does, considering none of this has happened in XY) then it's a sign that your argument isn't a good one.