はるひ
:)
Whats wrong with a female looking muscular and a male being feminine-like?
Exactly, people make too big of a deal of this XD
Whats wrong with a female looking muscular and a male being feminine-like?
Yea, that's actually the first thing I noticed about Ninfia. I instantly thought "Wait, that looks like Skyla's hair." It looks like it could be her mascot Pokémon. Who knows, maybe Ninfia was originally supposed to be in gen 5 and be one of Skyla's Pokémon.Anyone noticed Ninfia's hair is similar to Skyla's?
I think it's a flying type too.
Exactly, people make too big of a deal of this XD
I wonder why there isn't a Bulbapedia article on Ninfia yet?
Well I think the fan base adapted to dark and steel well, so why not those sound and light types others want.
Also looking closer at the Ninfia fire move it looks to still either be fire or flying because they seem to be shaped like birds. So my faith in it being flying is back. However, the fact that both times it's been "???" and not just left absent is still kind of suspicious to me. I don't want there to be new types so much, but I'm open to it if GameFreak wants it.
Because there isn't much to say about it/laziness.
The word "Lucifer" comes from a passage in Isaiah, which mentions a Babylonian king and the "morning star." It doesn't mention Satan.At this point, I sound like spam and major trolling so, I'll stop after this. Ugh, this is what happens when I decide to take religion and actually be good at it. Lucifer/Satan/The Beast/Beelzebub/Whatever you want to call him are all the same entity.
My point is that if it's not based on the devil (as you said, 666/616 has nothing to do with Lucifer, but rather Nero, then what would it matter what Hell is like?Dark/Fire is because Hell is hot and very much evil.
A lot of us assumed that the bow was supposed to be Espeon's color, and that the character on the end was the mystery one (I mean, come on, it's got those special stars).So, I can't believe we missed it and idk if this was brought up but the Ninfia's bow is actually in this poster.
butbutbut preconceived gender stereotypes
Do you not mean that the colours of the katakana represent the Eeveelutions and Eevee?When translated, it says "Flareon, Jolteon, Vaporeon, Eevee, Ninfia, Umbreon, Leafeon, Glaceon, Espeon." I think those stars might indicate Espeon.
Omg number 35!!!1!Fun fact: Ash was originally going to start with Clefairy, but they changed it to Pikachu. Just something to consider.
Your entire post is based on your opinion.There won't be new types. They could do that in gen II because there were only 152 other pokemon. If they did that now, there would be like 6 light types vs. 649 pokemon that aren't.
Light would have been a good idea in gen I or II. It's far too late now.
And Ninfia is normal type.
I have to agree, giving a number a reference is frivilous. Numbers don't really mean anything, other than Legends/Rarity in some cases. Ex. Pikachu is the mascot, but #25. No significance.
![]()
So, I can't believe we missed it and idk if this was brought up but the Ninfia's bow is actually in this poster.
OMG... based on this we can pretty much confirm Ninfia is going to be the only new Eeveelution.
There won't be new types. They could do that in gen II because there were only 152 other pokemon. If they did that now, there would be like 6 light types vs. 649 pokemon that aren't.
Light would have been a good idea in gen I or II. It's far too late now.
And Ninfia is normal type.
There won't be new types. They could do that in gen II because there were only 152 other pokemon. If they did that now, there would be like 6 light types vs. 649 pokemon that aren't.
Light would have been a good idea in gen I or II. It's far too late now.
And Ninfia is normal type.
Your entire post is based on your opinion.
Unless the two stars mean anything (although I doubt that they do).