The thing I don't understand with pokebeaches source is surely it contradicts what smash has said, a legitimate source. Why did this not instantly discredit the pokebeach rumours?
The names theirselves are obviously well thought our a combination of obscure enough words, but why didn't pokebeach already mention them? From the timeline it sounds of though the source told GF stuff they eventually told us, these pokemon come out, the source who hadn't mentioned them before now knows their names....
But the pokebeach source played a beta he would already have all of his information together not constantly receiving new information.
If you were leaking information to a pokemon website wouldn't you go with what new pokemon are in the game, from the amount the source did reveal its not as if they are shy on sharing.
But then again assuming these names are incorrect all the source had to do was say they don't know the names, they never saw these pokemon, to be able to keep and air of credibility for longer than three days. The confidence to share these names is what psuades me the most I suppose.
Tomorrow hopefully we'll get English names and we can know, if they are wrong would you buy the argument of, "I was playing a beta they must of changed." I don't think it'll float with me.