Genaller
Silver Soul
What you seem to be undermining is that Ash striving to win 1 of these league conferences has been a key long term narrative of this show in and of itself meaning that him finally winning a league conference is meant to be the culmination of said 20+ year narrative; however, because the standard of competition is so blatantly inferior, this league seemingly being the conclusion is extremely unsatisfying to many long time fans, and I’m sure you should be able to understand that whether you ‘give a damn’ about this long term narrative or not. I’ll give you that this can still be considered a meaningful accomplishment for Ash in isolation (still not as impressive as conquering the battle frontier); however, that notion falls flat if this is supposed to be the accomplishment that all of Ash’s other league performances were building up to. The question of whether we’d be as satisfied with Ash winning this league as we would have with him winning any other conference can be translated to the following equivalent question:You and I have incompatible views about this. This isn't a real life sporting event where the prowess of the competitors can be measured, but a story where the narrative significance of the battles are the most important thing. Characters with build-up face other characters with build-up because it creates dramatic stakes and tension, whereas a character introduced specifically for the tournament vs a main character lacks the same narrative weight. For example, Ash vs Katie in the Hoenn League. Katie seems a good trainer, which makes Ash's win impressive, but the only significance to that fight was Ash progressing to the next round. Going back to the example I used, I would not give a damn if Ash beat a bunch of trainers who have been rigorously screened and are "objectively" strong if I knew nothing about said characters.
I'm not going to argue about the weight of achievement because I've already acknowledged that the standard of competition isn't as high as other leagues. But being a lower standard doesn't diminish the league's legitimacy. The winner proves himself the best within that group of trainers, and assumes a recognised position in the story. Ash winning would be an accomplishment for him, as something he's not done very often, and while it may not be as big a deal as you'd like it to be, it'd be a significant point in the story and for Ash's character.
If Ash wins this league, would this achievement serve as an acceptable conclusion to the series long narrative of Ash competing in and actively trying to win a league conference?
My answer would be a resounding NO.
It seems you’ve gravely misunderstood my definition of ‘legitimate league contender’. It simply means that the trainer in question satisfies certain quality standards which can be verified by achievements like having collected 8 of a region’s gym badges. When I said over 2/3rds of those top 16 trainers aren’t legitimate, I meant there’s no way in the distortion world that they’d be capable of qualifying for the league conferences of any other region; that’s all.I acknowledged this in a previous post. What I'll say here is that the number of "legitimate league contenders" in previous leagues has always been small. There has never been a league where every competitor was viewed as a potential winner, and we've always known which ones would go deep and which wouldn't. In the Kalos League, you only had Ash and Alain. In Sinnoh, it was Ash, Paul and Tobias. In Hoenn, it was Ash or Tyson, and now in Alola, you've got Ash, Guzma and Gladion. So if you're going to criticise the Alola League for not having convincing competitors, then you have to criticise every other league, too.
I don’t particularly care what you think of this show as long as you understand why many long term fans consider this league conference to be unsatisfying.I'll finish with this, because I don't want this to be a circular debate:
Our views on many issues with the show are polarising and we've never reached an agreement on anything. I don't care about which trainer is objectively the strongest, which Pokemon you think are objectively stronger than others, and whatever system you have to determine whether something is an achievement or not.
Some do and some don’t. I can make fairly strong cases that several writers did to varying degrees based on the specific battle episodes they wrote.I don't believe, for one second, that the writers create battles with any of that mind.
Believe what you will but with that mindset understand that you’re dismissing a key overarching narrative of this show.I know full well that making trainers seem strong and giving them significant victories over strong opponents lends itself to the narrative, but for me, it's not something that has to be so specific you can measure it. Most of all, I'm more interested in the narrative stakes behind the fight, and how the fight itself reflects those stakes in the action. The league is merely the stage for those fights to occur, ensuring there's more significance to the outcome than just your average fight.
Just to be clear the narrative surrounding and during individual fights does matter (and even in that sense I consider the Alola League to be well below par), but it should not be at the expense of compromising a 2 decade old overarching narrative which is what happened here (the real reason this league had no barriers to entry was because the writers wanted several individuals to participate but either didn’t want to focus on giving them arcs where they cleared said barriers or didn’t think them clearing it would be believable).