04n70n10
Well-Known Member
No, I linked above an exhaustive article for those interested that explain the theory.Seems like damage control if they're acting like some of the seizures didn't happen, which is victim shaming.
There is no doubt that at least some children did in fact experience seizures and other afflictions, the point is indeed the incidence of photosensitive epilepsy: is estimated at 1 in 5,000 and such an incidence (0.02 percent of the population) comes nowhere near explaining the sheer number of children affected.