If you are referring to the Bible, hardly anything in it would suggest evolution happened outside of different interpretation of time.
11And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. (Genesis 1:11-12)
Note that this is not creation
ex nihilo. This is God being said to allow the grass to bring forth plant life
outside of divine fiat.
20And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
21And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. (Genesis 1:20-21)
Note, again, that God permitted the waters to bring forth life (
including fowl, who are said to have their origin in the waters) rather than creating them by command.
24And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
25And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. (Genesis 1:24-27)
Note that the earth is allowed to bring forth living creatures.
7And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. (Genesis 2:7)
God created man from the dust of the ground, that is, something of the earth that
previously existed.
You mention the interpretation of time as a concept of scripture, of particular interest when discussing the age of the earth. Genesis 49:26 and Deuteronomy 33:15 both describe the earth as "ancient," using a word which, in Hebrew, is more commonly identified with the age of God and the duration of His existence.
I would be remiss if I didn't mention that artificial selection is mentioned in the Bible. Genesis 30:32-36 depicts Jacob ridding Laban's flock of goats with undesireable characteristics--how is this incompatible with evolutionary biology?
I will quote Origen, who has much wisdom to offer on the subject of the interpretation of scripture:
So that our meaning may be ascertained by the facts themselves, let us examine the passages of Scripture. Now who is there, pray, who is possessed of understanding, who will regard the statement as appropriate the first day, the second, and the third, in which both evening and morning are mentioned, happened without sun, moon, and stars? The first day was even without a sky!. . .
And who is so ignorant as to suppose that God, as if he were a farmer, planted trees in a garden, in Eden towards the east, with a tree of life in it—a visible, palpable tree of wood—so that anyone who ate of it with bodily teeth would obtain life, and, eating again of another tree, would come to the knowledge of good and evil? . . .
No one, I think, can doubt that the statement that God walked in the afternoon in paradise and that Adam lay hidden under a tree is related figuratively in Scripture so that some mystical meaning may be indicated by it. The departure of Cain from the presence of the Lord will obviously cause a careful reader to inquire what is the presence of God, and how anyone can go out from it . . . .
It is very easy for anyone who wishes to gather out of holy Scripture what is indeed recorded as having been done, but what nevertheless cannot be believed as having reasonably and appropriately occurred according to the historical account . . . .
The devil is said to have placed Jesus on a lofty mountain so that he might show him from there all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. How could it literally come to pass, either that Jesus would be led up by the devil into a high mountain, or that the latter would show him all the kingdoms of the world—as if they were lying beneath his bodily eyes and adjacent to one mountain?
Those who use the Bible to rail against evolution are ignorant of the purpose of the Bible. Those who say that the Bible is incompatible with evolution speak of that of which they know nothing.