So you're saying you expected to come into a thread of people who are DEBATING a topic and thought you'd just be able to say "HEY, here's my thoughts. This argument is over because of what I think."
Damn that'd be sweet if you could really do that.
I had no high hopes for your reply. Pseudo-intellectuals like you always disappoint in that aspect. You're talking to me like you're a frontman in debates but when you latch a straw man onto the top of your post that's when the retarded irony really comes across.
In addition, the entire basis of your thesis that "Evolution is not anti-creationism" is irrelevant.
We're not saying that they are.
I don't think you read what you post. I really don't. All I can glean from this is that someone breaking away from the misconception that Evolution and Creationism are contradicting theories is irrelevant in a thread titled 'Evolution Vs. Creationism'. If I have to spell out for you how that is a stupid ideal then it's best for you that you don't try to argue with me at all.
Rather, we're asking for people to give their own thoughts on the discussion of if evolution caused humans to be where we are today, or if we were created as such.
You seem very confused. I don't give anything about what you're asking people to reply. I'm questioning the general direction of this thread. You act like everyone is going to:
READ through the posts in this thread, you would have figured that out.
and figure out that they're not supposed to be arguing
what the thread title states but merely 'give their own thoughts on the discussion of if evolution caused humans to be where we are today, or if we were created as such.' I don't know what quality of your expects people on this forum to read eight pages before their final reply. It's not going to prevent another pseudo-intellectual from going on their own tangent about how creationism is illogical and evolution is true or vice versa. Evolution and Creationism are chalk and cheese. One deals about the creation of earth and the universe while the other revolves around the evolution of living organisms from simpler forms to more complex ones. They don't refute each other in any way. 99% of people don't know that; they're not fit to debate either topic at all because by accepting that creationism and evolution are conflicting they show that they have no real knowledge of either theory.
I have every right to be condescending.
Side-stepping that fact that your condescension is unjustified, it's not so much you looking down on me that bothers me than you're inane nature of putting up tangential posts and trying to act like a smartass. Learn your place.
Next time don't come into a debate thread thinking you're god.
Read the f****** posts, and DEBATE. Don't state your opinion like it's worth more than it is.
You contradict yourself more than any person I've ever had the displeasure of taking down. You deem my opinion unnecessary and asking me to DEBATE when you're the one asking people to give
opinions on whether they
think evolution is valid or not. You call my post irrelevant when it addresses the actual nature of this thread and you're so willing to admit that everyone here is not discussion what the original post inquired but are only giving their opinions on a single-ended topic.
I'd welcome it if someone actually provided logical opposition to my post but here I am taking down a pre-pubescent who whines when a single post refutes the original topic. You're not even bothering to try and give a rebuttal to the content of my post. You're criticising my character. You're not worth my while. At all. Why are you even in the debate board?
Goddamn I thought I was posting on Serebii.
