Yes. I've asked this question hundreds of times on this forum. I always get "because it's God" or "you're not worthy enough." What do you have to offer? Instead of attacking my supposed "bias" (which EVERYONE shares anyway), how about actually answering the question?
Yes to what? Yes to the notion that you've already made up your mind? That you've researched the things I mentioned? Would you mind clarifying, please?
GhostAnime, I did not attack your bias, I pointed it out. In the same breath, you said that you can be open-minded, you go and make a closed-minded statement. Do you not see the inconsistency? Furthermore, in your post, you did not ask whether eternal punishment was good--you said you would question God to the point of calling Him, a sadist. If you want me to answer that question, would you be ok with a PM response?
@Tim the turtle: Prove that condemnation of homosexual
actions is evil and that homosexual actions are morally acceptable. If you would be so kind, would you respond via PM? I don't want to spam up this thread.
@Profesco: Well dunk me in tartar sauce and call me a fish stick! What a terrible website! (Note non-serious twinkle in my eye)
Regardless of the strengths of their claims, the presuppositions they hold, or the accuracy of their arguments for God, the fact still stands that those who are already convinced that there can be no evidence for will not come to the conclusion that God exists. Also, pointing out the bias of the website does not help your case. They think there is objective proof that God exists. Thus that brings them to the same point as evolutionists. Both sides use statements about the universe (whether the statements are true are or not is a different debate) to support their religious views. Profesco, don't be guilty of intellectual snobbery.