Finally getting a chance to respond! Sorry about that!
Moving on, of course the strikethrough part was a joke. Besides having a basic timeline of the Revolution from this last school year, I plan to look more into it, especially the lesser known periods, meaning, the part up to Marie Antoinette's execution and the rule of Robespierre, which I think are really well known, won't be part of my research if I go forward with this idea. (Though, if I find it lacking I'll research it a bit more.)
Awesome.
In that case, why, yes, I
would like to see more historical Pokémon fic.
By the way, thanks for reminding me that it was figures. I couldn't remember, and all I could remember was characters because, well, the word story was in my head. Sorry about that, to anyone I might've offended.
No prob. XD Happens to the best of us.
Also, subtle (or not so subtle when I think about it) distortions to real life events have been done countless times before, iirc. The Assassin's Creed series is a great example of this, from what I've heard.
True, but it's usually done after a lot of research. What makes things like Assassin's Creed (or, really, any other fictional work set in a historical time period, particularly those that mess with historical facts and figures)
interesting is the attention to detail things like that put forth. A lot of work goes into capturing the spirit of the time period, so historical fiction frequently acts more like an AU than its own thing. And by "AU," I mean "what-if scenario in which something has changed, and the rest of the work partly revolves around the question of how things end up being different because of that change." Either that or the "same timeline from a different perspective" variety. So while historical fiction
does take its liberties, you can usually see where and why at the same time, and it's usually pretty clear that the liberties are being taken not because the writer didn't do their homework but instead because it's necessary for the storyline to take those measures.
For well-written historical fiction, anyway. The other variety (the type of fiction in which things are fudged just because the research side of things could've been better)
does exist, and you usually can tell that it does because the world-building isn't as great as it can be. Either that, or the historical inaccuracies are just kinda obvious to people who know what to look for (read: probably your readers).
'Course, there's also the
other variety of so-so historical fiction, wherein the story sticks so closely to its research that it ends up reading like a slightly dramatized textbook, so in short, writing historical fic is definitely a balancing act. Writers end up having to figure out where that balance between taking liberties and staying true to history actually is for their particular story, but the first step is definitely doing one's homework first and figuring out from there what should stay and what should go. Or doing cursory research into what would be most relevant. (Unfortunately, as boring as politics can be,
all of them are relevant to the revolution.)
Which brings up the other point!
Though I am a bit afraid of insulting someone's culture now if I do go forward with this...
Aww, sorry about the discouragement on my part there. What I meant to say was if you do your homework and work hard at putting together your story, it might be doable. But one of the other bigger issues to contend with is whether or not the readers will know if you forget something rather important.
Putting it another way, think about the American Revolution (assuming you're American). You've probably spent a good chunk of your early life learning about the revolution. You probably know the battles, some of the generals, what led to the war—you get the idea. So let's say someone from another country tries to write a fic about the American Revolution, but they don't know that much about it. If you sat down to read that fic, only to find that the story says the entire war was just over tea, you'd probably notice, right? And you'd also probably notice if the fic said John Adams was a general, right? You might not be
offended, but you'd
know. And if you know, then that might affect the way you read that fic—as in, it might keep you from taking it seriously, even if it's trying to
be serious.
That's what you'll want to avoid with a fic about someone else's history, in other words. In quite a few cases, sure, definitely, you'd not want to offend anyone by portraying their culture and history incorrectly. (There are some cases where doing that would be considered racist.) But in general, including in this case, you'll also want to be careful because mistakes might be noticeable.
So! End of the story is, I didn't mean to scare you, and I'm so sorry about that. D: But if it helps, you can probably get by without too much worry. Buuuuut it
does require some homework-doing on your part. I'd also check with the French to see what's considered absolute common knowledge for them and make sure you keep that part in mind too when you sit down to write.
Finally, I had this idea way before XY (though back then it had undertones of Classical Mythology. It still kinda has one, but I'm trying to change that), so no connections to Kalos... maybe. It gave me an idea. Anyway, I just thought of the traditional way of putting a human in the Pokémon world: amnesiac humans turned Pokémon. Though, one of them is a Phantump, so maybe I would play a little with it's dex entry.
If you do need more clarification, just feel free to ask. I'm always open to suggestions and I love seeing your point of view. It makes me think.
Hmm. I
am still a bit curious because I'm trying to envision which world this is. So right now, I'm thinking this might be one of three scenarios:
1. The story takes place in the human-inhabited Pokémon world, so you're talking about the actual French Revolution (according to their world, I mean), but a single human was turned into a Pokémon.
2. This is a Pokémon-inhabited world (i.e., the PMD universe), so you'd have things like a Pikachu Marie Antoinette and so forth.
3. It's both (in that it's a single universe), and a Pokémon with ties to the French Revolution has stumbled into a PMD timeline in which the revolution has already happened a long, long time ago, back when humans were still around.
The first and third might be interesting to read about because you'd be doing a lot of world-building or history-exploring, and that just sounds
fascinating. (That and it'd
suck if some dude had to deal with the revolution
and being turned into a Pokémon, and
that sounds
hilarious.) The second ... I don't know. It might come off as a bit of a gimmick for the same reason no one does Romeo and Juliet-but-with-Pokémon adaptations anymore: because things just seemed forced. Like, those two elements were two separate things, but overlaying one with the other (i.e., saying, "It's this, but with Pokémon") tends to take the easy route of getting that crossover to work, whereas establishing explanations and finding ways to take the two incompatible things and piece them together so that they're still separate but also fit together (if that even makes sense) tends to make for stronger fic with more expansive worlds. That and it'd probably be difficult to take the French Revolution seriously if a bunch of Pikachu stood in for half the royal court, y'know?
In other words, if you're taking the history of the human-inhabited Pokémon world and connecting it to a separate PMD world
or if you're just taking some elements of the PMD universe and throwing them into the human-based French Revolution, that might be interesting. If you're recasting the French Revolution with Pokémon, that might be harder to swallow.
So! Definitely interested in hearing more about how these two worlds will mesh together, but with the explanations you've just given us, it
does sound rather intriguing.