On the point of gay adoption:
I do oppose this one... I just don't believe that a gay couple of parent's is an adecuate enviroment for a child. At the very least that child is going to have an unnatural inclination towards homosexuality; which in my opinion should be tolerated, but not endorsed;
Yep, all gay parents will raise gay kids, just like how all straight parents raise straight kids.
Studies have been done to show that gay parents are no worse than straight parents.
and at the worse prejudices against heterosexual relationships...
Why do you think this? If anything, I'd think gay parents would teach kids to be more tolerant of people who are different after what they had to go through just to be allowed to adopt the damn kid and marry their significant other.
I have a very liberal interpretation on this. If you can do it, it's normal.
That is about the most general definition I've ever heard.
Nature has a very different interpretation. If it does not help the preservation of the species/ecosystem it's not normal. Therefore being gay is not natural, as it's not a standard animal instinct.
Gay animals exist. I'm pretty sure almost every species of animal has been discovered to have a few examples of homosexual members. Hell, there is a species of lizard that engages solely in homosexual sex while reproducing. Furthermore, it could be argued that gays help preservation of the species and the ecosystem by not reproducing, therefore helping to combat overpopulation.
Society has a very different interpretation on this matter. If it goes against the mentality of the community you live in, it's not normal.
Society ultimately does not matter. Society used to oppose interracial marriage. No one will be harmed by gay marriage and gay adoption.
Can you begin to grasp the depth of the matter? It's not just homosexuality, it's a change as a whole. Being different. Being unnatural(Quoting the description above)
Who the hell cares if it's not natural? According to nature, drinking a soda isn't natural.
In my book, even murder is normal. As Freud said, the human being is inherently violent, and will by all means manifest it. In myself it's just fairly regular verbal abuse and a punch... But as nature makes us different, some are angrier than others... Some bottle it up for years... And some kill.
Defining natural by your first definition, it depends on what you mean by "if you can do it" (see what I mean by being overly general?). If you mean is it possible for you to do it, then sure, maybe. If you mean legally, then no, you can't, therefore it's unnatural.
Defining natural by your second definition, it certainly is not natural, as murder does not assist in the propagation of the species - in fact, it outright hinders it.
Defining natural by your third definition, again, it's unnatural.
But the big thing you managed to prove here, assuming murder is natural, is that natural does not necessarily mean good.
On a related subject, the only gays I have a problem with are pedophiles that like boys
Statistically, the majority of child molesters are straight people. Such actions are based on dominance and a desire for power, not because of sex itself.
Also, does that mean you're okay with pedophiles that like girls? o.o
and the guys from "Queer eye for the straight guy"...
So stereotypical gays? How the hell do they hurt you? Just by "creeping you out"?
Those creep me out, and if they show up at my doorstep, they're getting a magnumload of .44 bullets and an Epiphone Les Paul Goldtop '56 to the head (Yes, l4d2 did inspire this antic).
How tolerant and peaceful of you - wanting to take someone's life solely because "they creep me out". You creeped me out by saying that. Do I have the right to shoot you?
Grow the hell up.