FR/LG Graphics vs R/S/E Graphics

[ShinyFufu]

You have been warned, here is your punishment:

Spoiler: Here is your punishment

Sorry, I forgot your punishment... have fun!

Okay, seriously. This is a poll, so, which games do you think had better graphics, FireRed/LeafGreen, or Ruby/Sapphire/Emerald. I would have to say FR/LG.

 

[Aqua_Maiden]

R/S/E of course, but MMSP I think this belongs in Misc. Polls.

 

[ShinyFufu]

Does it? It is about FR/LG sorta...

 

[Omega Pirate]

This belongs on Pokepolls, and I'm gonna say R/S/E because the protagonists look better.

 

[Comray001]

I say FR/LG

 

[The Dean of Suds]

FR/LG definently.
Over and out,;198;

 

[GeminiDragon]

i say the R/S/E games have better graphics

 

[Freakshow]

FRLG's graphics ftw

 

[Hound00m]

FL/LG, way more crisp and visually pleasing imo.

 

[intergalactic platypus]

FRLG. RSE looked kind of clunky and clumsy, FRLG took care of that with crisper and sleeker sprites

 

[≈*Virulent Tsunami*≈]

Lmao, R/S/E easily. The FR/LG graphics were absolutely horrendous, an enormous step down from the smooth and well-done R/S/E ones.

~*CB*~
The 8th Champion​

 

[Satoshi]

I have to choose the FireRed and LeafGreen graphics. The Ruby, Sapphire, and Emerald graphics were great and all, but I personally thought the sprites and visuals (which mostly comes from the overworld character sprites) were a little more oversized than FireRed and LeafGreen's, which I thought were the right size for the game (the textboxes and the colored text looked better than the textboxes and typical black text Ruby and Sapphire had, also). Though, in my opinion, it was about the same as the Ruby and Sapphire graphics, only improved and modified.

 

[Orion-Sama]

I don't care for graphics, but RSE. Meh. I like the bigger overworlds and the bigger buildings overall.

 

[ellie]

Overworlds, FrLg. Pokemon and trainers, RS. I hate using dithering as a shading style, and most of the FrLg Pokemon did. Of course, I still use the sprites sometimes, but I reshade them and use the RS colors. They're much brighter ad vibrant, while the FrLg ones are dull.

 

[Manene]

I would have to say FireRed and LeafGreen. It's graphics are so sharp and crisp. The R/S/E graphics don't seem that way to me in my opinion.

Manene out;manene;

 

[Macross_Green]

I'm going with Fire Red/Leaf Green. Mainly because of the text style (the one in R/S hurt my eyes), but also because I like the main character sprites more in the FR/LG games. Emerald wasn't so bad because they fixed the text issue though, but if we're going overall, I prefer FR/LG.

 

[intergalactic platypus]

Lmao, R/S/E easily. The FR/LG graphics were absolutely horrendous, an enormous step down from the smooth and well-done R/S/E ones.

~*CB*~
The 8th Champion​

Kanto bias strikes again. I actually thought that many of the RSE sprites looked heavy and clunky. The pokemon looked thicker and less smooth then I think they should have. And since the graphics weren't wildly different, how could they be "a huge step down"?

 

[RiverStone]

FR/LG graphics were better, R/S/E were bulky and horrificly big. Overworld sucked, they were too tall. FR/LG was mucho bettero

 

[Kikas123]

I noticed the differnce!

 

[◘Ins0mnIac◘]

FR/LG even though they had the idiotic thing where the Pokemon bounce up and down instead of moving lol.