There's no need to be condescending just because people might have different opinions or views.
It's not condescending to point out that the omission changes nothing about my point. The argument "for" these games that don't exist doesn't suddenly get a Popeye spinach boost because someone unnecessarily points out the original games gave you Pokémon as victory rewards.
it would be your opinion on the matter that would be unnecessary.
All opinions are unnecessary. Mine, yours, that guy over there. Opinions are like mouths. They can suck, we all have them, and many of them smell unless we work daily to keep them clean.
The reality, however, is that this port that we are unnecessarily discussing:
- Doesn't exist
- Does not appear to be in the process of existing (nothing to suggest it's in development)
- Would, as far as we know, be completely cut off from any connectivity if re-released on a current system
- Would lack any value beyond nostalgia as a result of being cut off from that connectivity
None of those are opinions. "If people would be willing to purchase it and nintendo willing to pursue that market." That is an opinion, or at the very least, it's not based in fact. And if you want to try and say "my" opinion is unnecessary, that's fine - my opinion is completely unnecessary, because opinions don't mean much - but what conversely makes your opinion, or someone else's opinion, "more necessary?"
You can keep debating this if you want and saying "sure, I agree the games would have minimal value today and I accept they probably aren't coming, but I bet the nostalgia would sell a few copies." (All things you yourself have said). I lack means or inclination to prevent you from making your point. Keep at it, if you'd like.
I have, however, made my point clear enough, to the degree where I don't need to keep repeating it.