Groudon

[Cipher 2008]

There's a lot of bugs with this one, seeing as it was my first non-Dark card and I'd gotten used to faking Dark Pokémon. Yeah, some of the fonts and images are off. Meh.

Oh, and this time I made sure not to use an already-used picture. And I did credit the right person.

[Image Removed]

 

[Esperante]

wouldn't "all of groudon's attacks do 20 more damage" be better wording than the current second half of the body?

 

[Cipher 2008]

I just used the same type of wording that was on the EX: Ruby and Sapphire Pelipper. It'd have been easier, though...

 

[Esperante]

But isn't the wording on pelipper drawn from an attack as opposed to a power?

 

[Cipher 2008]

But isn't the wording on pelipper drawn from an attack as opposed to a power?

...That's a good point...heh, didn't notice that before. I'll change it later on. Thanks for pointing that out to me.

 

[Mew-100]

There's a lot of bugs with this one, seeing as it was my first non-Dark card and I'd gotten used to faking Dark Pokémon. Yeah, some of the fonts and images are off. Meh.

Oh, and this time I made sure not to use an already-used picture. And I did credit the right person.

Wow that should be a real card!

 

[nintendo jr]

Overpowered, because not is a Pokemon ex, good job, excellent Light Ho-Oh for edit the original art of the Groudon.

Byes everyone ;184;

 

[Cipher 2008]

There's a lot of non-Pokémon-ex that are more powerful than that. With the cards Nintendo are bringing out today, that's hardly overpowered for a normal Pokémon.

 

[Gily]

that looks real

 

[Walking Contradiction]

A really good, even a little overpowered card. I must say that majority of the new cards are overpowered too.

 

[nintendo jr]

There's a lot of non-Pokémon-ex that are more powerful than that. With the cards Nintendo are bringing out today, that's hardly overpowered for a normal Pokémon.

Yes you are right, but a little overpowered are.

Byes everyone

 

[RedJirachi]

Bravo.That's good work
2