No Lutz, this isn't a case of moral right and wrong vs legal right and wrong. This is a case of people who're opposed to Islam asserting a certain interpretation of what's going on is the incontrovertible truth and it simply doesn't square with the facts.
Wrong this is about morally right and morally wrong. What they are trying to do is morally wrong. There is no problem with them moving the Mosque further away, and that is the view of the vast majority of people that oppose this. But there is something morally wrong with building it so close to Ground Zero.
As far as I can see this is just a story being used by the same people who want to stop other Mosques being built in the US and stopping spires being put up on them in Europe, for whatever daft reason (fear of Islam cause it's a different religion, fear of Islam because they believe this nonsense about how 9/11 is sanctioned by Islam).
So.. you are saying the 70% of so who oppose this of the entire US population share the belief that no mosque should be built in the U.S.? Wow what a insulting blanket statement.
Now will you get a few insulting crazies who will oppose a mosque where ever it's built? Yes of course. But those idiots are drawfed by the sheer number of Americans who would gladly have a mosque down the street from them, but see this mosque being built so close to Ground Zero as insulting and disgusting.
After all there's already a proper Muslim prayer space in the area, that pre-dates the World Trade Centre towers, should they be shut down too?
Was it built with the knowledge the WTC was going to be attacked by Islamic Terrorists and thus that was the reason they choose that spot? If so I wouldn't just say it was morally wrong to build it, but it makes them a couple of Future Seeing Muslims.
Last edited: