Renegade said:
Sorry I don't like trace art, so even those first two are good copies from the Eragon books, they are that. Copies. The only one I really like is the third one, as atleast I know it should be original, and not something copied. But I'm still iffy on it as I'm not sure if it's original or not. So yeah you're good, but copying art is something anyone with a bit of talent and tracing paper can do .-.
I object that statement.
Firstly, anyone with a
bit of talent and tracing paper can draw a picture of Pikachu, but it sometimes takes real talent, determination and patience to copy something really detailed and difficult like the dragons of Eragon.
Secondly, how is it unnoriginal? So now it's unnoriginal to copy a picture you probably don't know anyone else whom has attempted to draw and Eragon dragon, is it?
And who says it's copied? Maybe she's just incredibly good at what she does. Notice (Take this as Constructive critisism, RocketMeowth) that on the second picture the right half of the dragon's face is slighty off a notch? If it were traced, it would be perfect.
Now then. Yeah, The Eragon series is the latest craze at my school, and I'm always hearing about it, hence the reason I waiting till it dies down a bit to read it, because I afraid some hardcore fan might jump out of nowhere and mouth off major spoilers in my face. *Cough* Rob *Cough*
Ahem >
:)
Love to see some more!