They should have made her a red head >.> since im one and im kinda waiting to finally get a female red head character.
But than there'd be too many theories that SHE is "Giovanni's kid".
Rarguh.
Just think of Silver as a girl, and you can let the dirty thoughts begin...
...What the...
...
YO anyone remember this picture
in the FireRed/LeafGreen strategy guide? It was before the front page, I'm not saying that I think Black Charizard will take a role in hggs but I think this was another hint so heck yea at this
That was promotional art. "Encounter with a Shiny Pokemon", it was titled, IIRC. Just a fun drawing.
ATTENTION ALL POSTERS IN THIS THREAD
Remember to post 3+ sentences of detail per post, and no making stupid posts/repeating over and over again/adding nothing/etc.
And also remember, do not minimod. If you see someone breaking the rules, use the report button or some other way to tell a moderator, and move on. Do not say "I'm reporting you!!" or tell them to stop it. It is not your job.
Why are the mods stressing this rule so much?
Even
Serebii himself has blatantly broken this rule, multiple times.
I can understand not wanting useless posts, but I think that two (and SOMETIMES one) sentence should be acceptable if it's long enough, ala we use a lot of commos and such to explain the post we were trying to bring across.
For example, the explanation I just wrote above this was only two sentences.
We should be able to use our judgment on whether or not it's acceptable.
Because sometimes it feels like your dragging out an answer.
Say someone posts this "I think there will be this. This can happen in this situation. Than that can happen" (Not literal sentence.The sentence is generalized...)
A reply will probably be "No, that will not happen, as that is not there, for this to do that."
But, that's only a sentence. If you try to make it three...
"No, that will probably not happen. The reason is because that is not there. Therefore, this can't do that there."
...It just sounds like it's dragging it out. =/
And again, Serebii has blatantly broken this rule as well.
Forgive the "arguing about a rule", or such... But I think the strictness of the rule is kind of annoying. I think something such as "No useless comments. Usually three or so sentances is good, although less can be acceptable sometimes. Just use your judgement.
" would be a better rule...
...I guess that's kind of down to opinion though, but... Eh...
"Hi, GOLD! How are you? I found a useful item shopping, so I bought it with your money. Sorry! It's in your PC. You'll like it!"
Yes, it's your mom. Remember how your mom used to buy items when you have saved enough money? I wonder how it will work, now that you cannot store/withdraw items on your PC.
They could easilly re-add the feature.
Or maybe, they could just buy items, and put them in your room. You can just pick them up there, or something. Or maybe she "mails them to you" or something. Perhaps, kind of like the Resort Area House in Platinum, you also get a house. And she "mails" you things.
...It's also somewhat likely that that feature may disappear, too...
I know it's a remake so we probably would, but I would still like something different because we got a togepi egg in platinum.
If the egg we get in the beginning
wasn't a Togepi, that would mean there would be no way to get a Togepi in the game, without hacking (or trading with a D/P/Pt game. ...Or migrating, assuming it's included.)
I bet the Running shoes will be given by your mom once you return home after your errand for Prof. Elm.
I remember that Prof. Elm told you to go talk to her and tell her you were leaving. However, you could just go without telling her. She'd then end up calling you, a bit annoyed. It was quite humorous...
Perhaps that would be removed? Maybe the opposite gender support-character would not let you leave, like they did in D/P/Pt, until you told them.
Hm...