The problem with this thread is that dub quality is in the eye of the beholder. So people don't agree with your opinions that the Naruto or the Bleach dub is awesome. So what? At the end of the day, does that really matter? Does it impede your enjoyment of the dub? Or is it just used as a talking point to be used in threads like these that segregate anime fans based on their preference in voice actors?
True, but it's merely how they
endow their opinion upon others that's bedeviling to some.
Sure, they can
have those opinions but the way they present them can lower the tolerance level of some. Stating that
they don't like the dub is fair enough as it's stating their opinion without berating the people
that actually enjoy the dub about the "crap" that they're watching - While them stating that the dub cuts everything, without explaining what they
are, and ruins the series beyond the level of
One Piece (I'm pointing at you,
Naruto fans) when they haven't
seen the dub is just plain ridiculous. Heck, some haven't
seen the
One Piece dub either, yet automatically say it's bad without actual
reason to support their opinion, only saying it's bad to support the accumulation of fans that believe that
all dubbed anime, whether in progress of coming into the country they're being dubbed in or already came, are bad (
because we all know that 4 or 5 "bad dub" on TV = anime). Pointing out things that are translated correctly as being "mistranslated" because it wasn't how their precious fansubbers translated it, which that
is a mistranslation, is utterly idiotic too. Esspecially when they
have to not know any Japanese at all to watch their precious illegal fansubs (which would probably get discontinued after the product is licensed).
Really, for example, if someone said that sadistic pedophiles deserved the rights to get married to prepubescent children (and possibly sexually abuse them) and legalize underage marriage -
stated it as an opinion - would you let it slide
because they stated it as an opinion (of course this is to a different degree, but it's an opinion nonetheless)? Of course you need evidence to back up you're opinion (unless it was a small opinion
that is true to the individual, such as not liking something) or else the "opinion" is seen as less factual then the the opposite.