The only reason gyarados wasn't part dragon in R/B/Y is because he'd be unstopable.
Hahaha. As if gamefreak cared about game balance back then. They made Psychic overpowered didn't they?
The only reason gyarados wasn't part dragon in R/B/Y is because he'd be unstopable.
Fine, I won't add a third.
This thread is pointless then.
Another thing. The fourth generation was shitty enough. I don't intend on ever buying D/P. They don't need another generation of crappy, ill-named, retarded looking Pokemon.
What makes you say that?
Anyway...
Volbeat and Illumise should be part Electric (hence their names).
No. *smites with myth*Typhlosion_Hunter_Mark said:Get rid of Gyarados's flying type.
Hahaha. As if gamefreak cared about game balance back then. They made Psychic overpowered didn't they?
No. *smites with myth*
I say that because 90% of the people posting on this thread are bashing my ideas.
Charizard and Gyarodos should lose FLYING and gain DRAGON
Milotic should get either ICE/DRAGON
and there should be a GLASS and LIGHT type
Hm, lemme ask you a few questions
First off, why is salamence dragon type? Its name is a combination of salamander+menace. A salamander=X=dragon. Salamanders are amphibians, and if anything it should be water type, so why dragon? Also, its under belly gives more of a turtlish look, so saying that it looks like a dragon wouldn't work that well either.
Also Garchomp. Its a landshark. So where the hell did dragon type come from? Its a shark living on the land, and sharks are fish, not dragons, but fish, so dragon type is a little misplaced isn't it?
.....Honestly I don't take this to seriously, I just want to see what your response is =)
I think instead of duel-typing, they should merge two types together for a designated pokemon into one.
For example: Heatran is a Fire/Steel type pokemon so that would mean in my case that it should be: Fire + Steel = Magma type.
So another example Water + Ice = Glacier type.
Maybe it sounds stupid, but it may be something Pokemon might come up with in the future.. XD
Salamence was an error. The name should have been for Flygon and in turn, Flygon's name for Salamence. Your "argument" is void. Garchomp is not based on mythological circumstances, where things are not always how they appear.Big bang theology said:Hm, lemme ask you a few questions
First off, why is salamence dragon type? Its name is a combination of salamander+menace. A salamander=X=dragon. Salamanders are amphibians, and if anything it should be water type, so why dragon? Also, its under belly gives more of a turtlish look, so saying that it looks like a dragon wouldn't work that well either.
Also Garchomp. Its a landshark. So where the hell did dragon type come from? Its a shark living on the land, and sharks are fish, not dragons, but fish, so dragon type is a little misplaced isn't it?
.....Honestly I don't take this to seriously, I just want to see what your response is =)
They did rectify it in Gold and Silver didn't they?
RBY =/= GSC
Which is so painfully obivous you should be ashamed that I have to tell you this.