1. We have moved to a new forum system. All your posts and data should have transferred over. Welcome, to the new Serebii Forums. Details here
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
    Dismiss Notice
  3. If you're still waiting for the e-mail, be sure to check your junk/spam e-mail folders
    Dismiss Notice

Is there evidence of Jesus' ressurection?

Discussion in 'Debate Forum' started by GhostAnime, Apr 11, 2011.

  1. bel9

    bel9 n3w 2 sppf :3

    I'm a Catholic. That means I believe bread and wine magically turn into Jesus's body and blood.

    I would appreciate it if you didn't put words into my mouth.

    Assuming makes and *** out of u and me. The cornerstone of Christianity is supposed to be based on the idea of Christ's teachings, not solely on his resurrection. As I've already stated I respect the story for the message it sends.
     
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2011
  2. meteor64

    meteor64 Show Me Ya Noobs

    I appreciate Christian =/= Catholic, but Catholicism is a branch of Christianity.


    I apologise. Thats not what I intended.


    And Christ "teaches" forgiveness when he is ressurected, does he not? While it's certainy not the whole story, it's definately an important part.
     
  3. legendarypokemonmaster

    legendarypokemonmaster Well-Known Member

    ^Show some evidence for your claims that evolution has been disproven. But then again, I don't really want to derail the topic, especially since there is an evolution thread, so maybe this should be continued there.
     
  4. Charmander#4

    Charmander#4 Dating Rosie Palms?

    This is one statement I don't understand. First of all, carbon dating can only be used for things that are no more than a few thousand years old and organic. Secondly, rocks have been found that were several billion years old. Where is your source? Here's one of mine: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/8...here-at-the-earths-beginning-researchers-say/

    It's spelled Cro-Magnon. And no, no it has not. Searching around, I was unable to find any sources for this piece of information: Where did you hear this?

    I did. Now you do the same.
     
  5. cantab

    cantab Well-Known Member

    Trying to date the earth by carbon dating is like trying to measure the speed of a fighter jet with a weather station anemometer. That you make the claim you do indicates you're woefully ignorant of how radiometric dating of rocks works.
     
  6. ChedWick

    ChedWick Well-Known Member

    "LOL" indeed. These kinds of topics always have a half dozen incredibly ironic posts. Yours being one of them. You make a lot of claims with out anything to back them up.
     
  7. 7 tyranitars

    7 tyranitars Well-Known Member

    I can't believe I'm actualy saying this but the resurection of jezus can be taken 2 ways:
    the literly way he really did came back to life etc etc..

    or he came back a life through peoples minds like how death family/friends to you are still alive in your head because they didn't disapeared out of your mind
     
  8. meteor64

    meteor64 Show Me Ya Noobs

    I like this invisible evidence you're showing me.
    Indeed, using a method devised to measure the ages of things within the realms of human history is perfect proof of the earths age. There's absolutely no way the earth is "billoions" of years old.
    Mmmmmmm...Magnum. Got a craving now.
    It's a shame people seem to be questioning your knowledge of the topic at hand instead.
    And ironic argument is ironic.
     
  9. cantab

    cantab Well-Known Member

    Well why don't you give us some pointers, some links to descriptions of this evidence?
     
  10. bel9

    bel9 n3w 2 sppf :3

    Since you're such an expert why not enlighten us poor misguided souls.

    link or it didn't happen.

    False.

    I want you to know this would also mean that the entire first half of the Bible was false and time didn't start until Jesus was born.

    Furthermore the fact that the Black hills have been dated back to at leastn 1.8 billion years ago means that you're pulling that fact straight out of your ass.

    No. Your grammar and punctuation is atrocious. Your message and over all central idea is unclear. Your organization could use tons of work too. Despite your overall condescending nature to the debaters here, you seem to fail to understand that you are the fool who makes absolutely no sense. You cite absolutely nothing when asked which makes you look like you're pulling stats right out your arse.
     
  11. legendarypokemonmaster

    legendarypokemonmaster Well-Known Member

    ^How do you know they are not both true? The little globe next to the color A is for posting links. We should probably continue this discussion on evolution to the "Let's debate evolution" thread, since this is about the resurrection of Christ.
     
  12. rykerr1

    rykerr1 The Great Gublet

    OK first of all.... You keep saying that evolution has been disproven, yet give absolutely no evidence.

    Secondly, the fact that we can use Uranium-238 to date rocks PROVES that the earth is billions of years old, because Uranium-238's half life is 4.5 billion years.

    You say carbon dating disproves that earth is billions of years old, but it isn't even used to date rocks. It only dates organic material.

    So I think your "theories" have more holes than anyone elses.
     
  13. AzukanAsimbu

    AzukanAsimbu Petal Paladin


    i laughed. so that means im the Antichrist too. because i have such a desire to kill thousands of people and take their souls back to hell

    and yes apparantly Catholics think Jesus is coming on May 21st? im not sure why
     
  14. legendarypokemonmaster

    legendarypokemonmaster Well-Known Member

    ^What? Who said that?
     
  15. foodmetaphors

    foodmetaphors Well-Known Member

    Imagine you're reading about somebody's life. The first account of them was written by someone who never claimed to have seen them in the flesh but rather as a ghost years after the timeline given for their life. Their biography is written several times over even later than the account of their appearance as a ghost was written. And the identities of the writers of these biographies are still unknown. Going further, this person was extremely famous as is shown in many parts of their biography. And yet no contemporary record of their account can be found.

    Some of the information on this person doesn't even match up.. including a nine year difference between when it was claimed they were born. There's no first-hand evidence for anything that occurred during his life. He didn't resurrect because he didn't exist in the first place. And there are so many issues of using the Bible as a source considering that the events described in Exodus, for example, never happened.
     
  16. legendarypokemonmaster

    legendarypokemonmaster Well-Known Member

    ^I don't see it...anywhere.
     
  17. ChedWick

    ChedWick Well-Known Member

    About as accurately as the bible I would say.
     
  18. legendarypokemonmaster

    legendarypokemonmaster Well-Known Member

    How dare you insult the bible like that!
     
  19. rykerr1

    rykerr1 The Great Gublet

    I don't understand. What are you implying about rocks, minerals, fossils, and bones? They exist, we have dating that proves some are billions of years old. Are you trying to tell me that fossils disprove evolution?

    Besides, rocks, fossils, etc are not the only things we have as evidence of evolution...
     
  20. ChedWick

    ChedWick Well-Known Member

    /sarcasm? Honestly can't tell. I'd like to think so though.
     

Share This Page