GentleArtillery
Always subjective
One thing I've wondered a lot about is why Game Freak (or probably Nintendo of America, those barbarians who destroyed Pokémon Diamond and Pearl with gramatical errors such as "SolarBeam" and "NeverMeltIce") insist on classifying almost all vaugely rodent-like Pokémon as mice.
Pikachu, Mouse Pokémon - well, this is quite sensible...
Raichu, Mouse Pokémon - kinda sensible, too, but I think it's more of a kangaroo rat...
Sandshrew, Mouse Pokémon - armadillo? Pangolin? Or, as its name suggests, shrew?
Sandslash, Mouse Pokémon - this is obviously not a mouse, Sandslash just screams out "pangolin."
Cyndaquil, Fire Mouse Pokémon - ...what about an echidna? Would it be too hard to write down?
Bidoof, Plump Mouse Pokémon - beaver.
Why do they keep classifying Pokémon as mice? Why not write "Beaver Pokémon" as Bidoof's species? Do they think that small children don't know what beavers are? Well, I for one, consider "rendezvous" (Luvdisc) a more complicated word than "beaver."
Pikachu, Mouse Pokémon - well, this is quite sensible...
Raichu, Mouse Pokémon - kinda sensible, too, but I think it's more of a kangaroo rat...
Sandshrew, Mouse Pokémon - armadillo? Pangolin? Or, as its name suggests, shrew?
Sandslash, Mouse Pokémon - this is obviously not a mouse, Sandslash just screams out "pangolin."
Cyndaquil, Fire Mouse Pokémon - ...what about an echidna? Would it be too hard to write down?
Bidoof, Plump Mouse Pokémon - beaver.
Why do they keep classifying Pokémon as mice? Why not write "Beaver Pokémon" as Bidoof's species? Do they think that small children don't know what beavers are? Well, I for one, consider "rendezvous" (Luvdisc) a more complicated word than "beaver."