I didn't realize there were such racial tensions in Mexico. I was aware of the problems on the southern border, though, in terms of the same issue of non-Mexican immigrants coming over the border. Don't they get arrested and deported?
Mexico's border with Guatemala is brutal as well, we do mistreat the illegals coming from there into Mexico and we do send them back, we don't do this to Americans and Europeans and such that come to Mexico since we desire their money, the poorer central american countries not really. And yes there are still racial tensions between the native indians of Mexico and the "new" Mexicans though this mostly in poor "uneducated" parts of the country, modern cities and places not so much.
Isn't Mexico building a border wall as we speak while Calderon bashes America for doing the same thing for the same reasons?
I don't think Calderon has directly bashed or accused the U.S of being inhuman against illegals, he just says all people should be treated "fairly" no matter were they are or something like that. When the Arizona Law took effect, Calderon did warn people not to go to that state as it's not "safe" and you will all get arrested for simply looking Mexican, I guess he kinda bashed on Arizona.
So American drug use is at fault? It is again joint blame and responsibility, because Mexico can't control the flow of illegal substances through their own country.
The Drug cartels have many authorities bought both in Mexico and in the U.S that's why they can grow their drugs in Mexico or have them come in from South America with little trouble, and then bring them to the U.S in huge numbers with little trouble. It's not "Mexico's" fault that there are cartels, drug cartels exist in many different countries. It is the Cartel's fault for doing what many Americans tell them to do and that is bring the drugs here. And it's also the American's fault for asking for illegal drugs and such.
Although, I must admit, the drug war scares me down there and is very underreported. I thin kthere have been more deaths in the past few years down there than in Iraq.
Well in the Mexican news channel that I watch, every single day they report something about he drug cartels, here in Mexico it is very popular and is very reported, in the U.S I guess it is underreported.
As far as Mexico vs Iraq, I'm not too sure, there are many unreported deaths in Mexico that relate to the drug war, but there's many unreported deaths in Iraq, but I think Iraq is still more violent, in Mexico we don't have suicide bombers or planes dropping bombs all over the place. As far as a single city yes Ciudad Juarez of Mexico does rank higher than any single Iraqi city in deaths, 1 in every 10 people or so die in Ciudad Juarez, but just in that city, really there's only like 4 deadly cities in Mexico as opposed to 10 or so deadly cities in Iraq.
I'll have to say, it doesn't look like things are getting taken care of. It looks like it keeps getting worse. It just seems that the fingers are always pointed north of the border.
Some of these are propaganda lies and such, this year and last year there have been many major arrests of drug cartel lords. It may look like we're losing the drug war because of an increase in violence, but that's because the tighter you squeeze these cartels the harder they're gonna strike at you, progress requires major violence, but is still some kind of progress.
For instance around 2005-2008 Tijuana was in bad shape, the Ruling Drug cartel of Tijuana was brought down with the arrests of All their leaders, and the leaderless followers caused some major trouble, they shot up a big public Hospital trying to retrieve some injured followers, they had a shoot out in front of a Kinder School with the Police, and so on. However today Tijuana's violence decreased a lot around 2009-2010 and the Tijuana cartel does not truly exist anymore, so for the moment that city did accomplish something, the potential problem now is the other major cartels that are trying to move into Tijuana to take over, but it hasn't happened just yet.
US employers taking advantage of low wage migrant workers is a horrible problem, but that doesn't absolve Mexico from letting it get to this point. I just want to see a joint effort, and from our standpoint (especially if you look at Calderon's most recent visit) we are the evil in the equation.
Well here Mexico can't really tell U.S Employers to not hire illegals, even if we do WE can't arrest them so why would they listen to us, that is the U.S's job to enforce their laws. Mexico can clean up Mexico, but if the people still prefer the much cleaner U.S well we can't really force them to stay we're not that kind of regime, if they want to go well then let them go, be it to the U.S China Japan England etc.
It's probably too much of a dream to hope that Mexico and the United States could admit their own faults and cooperate on the problem.
Even if they know what their faults are, if they choose not to fix the problem then what can people do, but to protest & protest until they come to their sense.
I just want to make sure we see the problem looking at the entire picture. The recent Colbert escapade showed that, once again, it is our fault. We need to start addressing all angles of the problem, but unfortunately that is ifinitely hard with two sovereign nations.
Like I said Mexico is doing it's job, maybe nobody hears about over here, or they don't hear the positive things only the scary ones, that doesn't mean good things aren't happening.
Awarding them with citizenship is not the answer. It encourages the continuation of this with a reward if nothing is done to control the border. If you have a leak, you need to fix the leak first and then bail out. Bailing out while the water keeps running doesn't do anything.
Yes the U.S is in a tough pickle, if you suddenly deported all the farm workers and such then the agriculture industry could slow down meaning less food delivered and higher prices since they can't get cheap labor.