That was a strange chapter. Really didn't see why either Obito or Kakashi would have to sacrifice themselves when both Naruto and Sasuke had the means of saving themselves, using clones and Susanoo respectively. Let's not even get into the fact that she could have just dropped them in the acid realm and that would have likely killed them all off without her having to do anything. And Obito's obsession with Rin is still creepy.
First off, we never got any confirmation on Jay being killed or who did it, as oppose to literally seeing Sasuke go kill crazy at the summit to the point that Suigetsu called him out on it. Seems off for Sasuke to kill him when he had no problem hours before allowing that other Kumo ninja to live. Secondly, the summit was called not because a Bijuu was taken, but because someone who was actually cared for was taken. Ee wanted revenge for his brother, thus the complete lack of mention of Yugito and the sudden drop in concern about Sasuke once Kirabi was revealed to be alive. And Sasuke was already a declared missingnin, even before Danzo got into office. There wouldn't have been any chance of war had it not been for Naruto declaring Sasuke was still apart of the village. Third, I was mistaken, it was the chapter after the next (404), but when asked by Obito what he had planned, Sasuke stated taking out the top was it. It was then that Kisame mentioned that the rest of Konoha would shield them. I don't see why you think Sasuke was being more honest with Obito then his own teammates, especially given his actions up to and after that point. Aside from the aforementioned Kumo ninja, risking his life and saving his teammates while remembering his old team, and his attempt to escape Akatsuki, you would note how he decided to go after Danzo instead of a village full of weaken and easy targets. And I'm guessing by telling me to see volume 44 and 45 (which is hard given that I read online and thus there aren't any volumes) you mean chp 416? But even in that chapter, he wasn't automatically killing the innocent. He states that if someone opposes his belief, he would kill their family and then see how they felt about it then. Sure that's bad, but it's not anything new. Sasuke threw that same line of reasoning out at Kakashi back in Part One. It's a stance he already held, so unless you're saying he was a villain since that point, it would still be him being an anti-hero.
I would point out that Nagato, Obito, and Itachi are all currently seen as anti-heroes, despite both of them actually killing innocent people, including children. Not to mention the Bijuus. In a world where heroes willingly preform assassination, the death of innocents is a small factor in judging who's a villain or not. Danzo never killed anyone on-screen, and Madara is hazy, but it's clear they both are seen as villains.
