WinterSnowblind said:
Again, that's a very typical fanboy reply. The PSP is nothing like the GBA in anyway, it's more of a multimedia unit, rather than a games machine. It can be used as an MP3 player, you can watch tv shows and movies, view pictures, go on the web, etc.
It's a very good handheld, but the problem with it is that it doesn't really have many games worth buying, and the movies have to be bought on UMD format, which just really makes them worthless. Sony are also charging ridiculous amounts of money for it.
The DS however isn't much better. It's way too much of a gimmick. the touch screen doesn't add much to gameplay, and most games don't even bother using it for anything beyond a map. It's just an unneccesairy feature that makes the DS heavier than it needed to be, and difficult to use for extended periods of time. Plus it also has the problem of having very little games worth owning.
Overall, I see the PSP as being more useful, but we'll see how I feel when the DS get's more of it's killer app titles out.
Hmm ok, I notice from your sig that you've left (and that this was originally posted like 4 months ago but whatever, I find this to be an excellent post to base mine on), so I'm going to feel quite awkward talking to no one here, while replying to a months old post...
I agree with what you said about the PSP, it is NOT crap like all the fanboys here are so keen to say based on some seriously trivial arguments. But like you said, there are little to no games that actually offer any lasting entertainment, and the general quality of PSP titles are rather substandard (there are some exceptions eg. Lumines, and I guess Burnout: Legends). I was definitely very let down by GTA: Liberty City Stories, the frame rate was absolutely pathetic, and it didn't
really bring anything new to the series. Just a quick rehash of GTA3 in my opinion. UMD movies - well I really can't see myself sitting down with my PSP held in front of me for 2 hours to watch a movie on an undersized screen. And the multimedia capabilities? Well if you're willing to fork out $100 or so for a decent memory stick, then sure I guess it's a decent little media player, but add that to the already large price of the PSP + a few games, and you'll have blown a full week's pay easily. The PSP is however a great little system, but the fact that there are basically no decent games, the large price, battery power among other things really drags the system down.
What I disagree with there is what you said about the DS being "not too much better", "just a gimmick". Well, if you ask me that "gimmick" is a damned lot of fun. If you don't like it then hard luck, it obviously just isn't your thing. I however, see the DS as a huge breath of fresh air. It is not a gimmick, it really is alot of fun. A gimmick would be something new that at first seems pretty cool, but later loses it's novelty value, and is just seen as... well... a gimmick. The Nintendo DS features, still offer the same sort of entertainment they orginally provided back when I first got the system. Therefore I do not see how they can be classed as "gimmicks". Also in most
decent games, that screen is used for far more than just a map.
Sonic Rush - Touch screen controlled "half pipe" special stages
Warioware Touched - Pretty much the whole game uses either the touch screen or microphone
Super Mario 64 DS - Used as an analog stick, also used in the minigames
Nintendogs (haven't actually played it but I think I am correct here) - Touch screen used for something, and microphone used for... something :/
Feel The Magic XX/XY (I think that's it - haven't actually played this either) - Used for rubbing etc.
Metroid Prime: Hunters (I gotta add, the latest clips of this look absolutely awesome)[/b] - Used for aiming etc. (to the best of my knowledge)
Etc. etc. It's late I can't be bothered typing any more. So yeah, obviously then I don't agree that the touch screen is a "unnecessary" feature. After all, what would the DS be without it's touch screen? Basically just a 3D Gameboy (basically what the PSP is when taking the multimedia features out of the equation). Some games don't choose to use it - hey that's cool it's not like there's an unspoken rule that because the DS has extra features they NEED to be used >_>. Not enough games worth owning?
Super Mario 64 DS
Mario & Luigi: Partners in Time
Sonic Rush
Warioware: Touched
Meteos (apparently)
Nintendogs
Mario Kart DS
Animal Crossing DS (or whatever it's called)
Advance Wars Dual Strike
Metroid Prime Hunters (soon)
New Super Mario Bros (soon)
Pokemon Diamond/Pearl (soon)
I'm sure I've missed quite a few, but yes, quite a few games there worth having (and most of them I think were available when you posted).
I'm not saying the DS doesn't have it's faults however. I think the brightness of the screen can be improved (which it is - in DS Lite), as well as the position of the power button (which is addressed in DS Lite also). The graphics don't of course compare to the PSP, but they are decent enough to allow most gameplay features dependant in some way on graphical cability. The sound is distorted at low volume levels (although I'm not certain this is the case on all DS systems), there is the very slight risk of dead/deformed pixels (though you have to admit the PSP has a far worse record as far as dead pixels are concerned), and of course it does not have the multimedia capabilities of the PSP (the PSP I'd also like to mention, has a far superior screen currently).
Yes the PSP has more features - although at an absolutely ridiculous price if you are hoping to get any real use out of them. Yes the PSP has better graphics. But what matters most in a portable games console? The FUN FACTOR. And as far as I'm concerned at this point in time, the PSP has a very dull range of games of which most are basically ports of PS2 games anyway. The DS offers a far better range on top of the fresh and innovative control methods, and in all offers currently a lot more entertainment value than the PSP in my opinion.
I'd also like to say the I used to own both a PSP and a DS, I loved both of them, but as life would have it I ran into a few "financial problems" and was forced to sell one of them. After careful consideration, looking into the future of each system, and generally deciding on which system would be more beneficial to keep, I eventually chose the DS, selling my PSP with little loss on it's original value (due to the amount of Sony fanboys in New Zealand it was not hard), hoorah for me. Anyway a couple months down the track and I'm confident I made the right decision. The DS suits me just fine, and I know that on top of all the classic games already available for it, there are a whole load more still awaiting release.
Oh and if I didn't make it clear in my post - I don't think one system is better than the other. They are both brilliant systems. It's the other factors that led me to my choice to keep my DS over my PSP (games, cost etc.).
EDIT: Holy Shizzle Batman I can rant D: