can someone tell me why black kyurem is not uber, it has the stats to belong up there
Smogon made the decision to bring it into OU.
can someone tell me why black kyurem is not uber, it has the stats to belong up there
Shallow move-pool with poor coverage, Ice typing, and low Speed. Nonetheless, I think the guys at Smogon have officially lost all of their sanity.can someone tell me why black kyurem is not uber, it has the stats to belong up there
Shallow move-pool with poor coverage, Ice typing, and low Speed. Nonetheless, I think the guys at Smogon have officially lost all of their sanity.
I could not disagree with you more (thats directed to your whole post). Ubers is not relevant at all when it comes to tiering. It's all about the standard/ou environment. And Kyurem-B should've never been send back to OU for the reasons that I'm going to explain to you in this post. Please keep in mind that I'm not trying to attack you in person even tho it sometimes may seem like this. I'm just really dedicated to banning Kyurem-B again c:That's not a fair statement. Pokemon-Online's tiering guild (w/e the hell it's called) deemed Kyurem-B an OU pokemon about 3-4 months ago (approximately one month before Smogon Suspect Tested Garchomp). If anything, Smogon is slacking in identifying unsuitable Ubers.
Furthermore, your statement about Smogon losing all their sanity is just overstatement. Kyurem-B sucks in OU, even with its buffed stats.
I've played on PO's server for the majority of the summer (which was around the time Kyu was released into PO OU). All I can say is that it made no impact whatsoever to their metagame (which was devoid of Garchomp back then). Check their usage stats. It sits down near the 70~80 mark in usage, and its Normal forme does better than him.
Counter
I couldn't care more less if Kyurem-B did not have an impressive movepool as well, but it does. And because of it, it has only ONE true and reliable counter. That is Ferrothorn. Furthermore it has the highest attack stat in OU combined with the most powerful attack move there is: Outrage (Close Combat is 2nd).
Priority moves
Kyurem-B is weak to priority moves: yup, too bad nobody can actually OHKO him. I'll show some calcs:
252+ Atk Choice Band Technician Scizor Bullet Punch vs. 0 HP / 0 Def Kyurem-B: 324-384 (82.86 - 98.2%)
252+ Atk Choice Band Technician Breloom Mach Punch vs. 0 HP / 0 Def Kyurem-B: 324-384 (82.86 - 98.2%) -- guaranteed 2HKO
252+ Atk Flame Orb Conkeldurr (Guts) Mach Punch vs. 0 HP / 0 Def Kyurem-B: 228-270 (58.31 - 69.05%) -- guaranteed 2HKO
And Kyurem-B 2hko's every single last one of them, so that does not make them a counter.
Stealth Rock
But it has a weakness to stealth rock? Yes it does, but so does Ho-oh. SR is not and should never be a valid tiering argument. Rapid Spin exists for a reason. And the addition of Magic Bounce pokemon also adds to the fact that it is never a given that SR will be on the field. You could also give Kyurem-B roost if you're really that desperate (altho that would be dumb).
Impact on the metagame
I can judge by your post that you use offensive teams. And to be honest I agree with you on the usage part. To quote PO: Kyurem-B (2.91 %). It's on the 58th spot. So yes, Kyurem-B lacks against (hyper)offensive teams (which dominate atm). So I understand that you plea that it has made no impact. But, there is a but: it does have made a HUGE impact on the metagame itself. Why? I tell you why. Bulky teams and stall teams have lost their ground partly thanks to Kyurem-B (the others being Terrakion, Volcarona, Tornadus-T and the now banned Genesect). Adding Kyurem-B is a death sentence to bulky/stall teams because Kyurem-B has only ONE counter. Even Skarmory can not wall Kyurem-B. And if that doesn't impress you, then I would not know what does. The addition of Kyurem-B has lead to the fact that (hyper) offense is the only way to be victorious in this broken metagame.
But then I ask you this, why would we even let Kyurem-B back to OU when it does not have an 'impact' at all when you're facing (hyper)offense, but it utterly destroys the usability of bulky/stall teams? Kyurem-B does not 'add' anything to the metagame, it only removes things. And by this the diversity of the metagame will narrow, which is never a good thing IMO. So they should ban Kyurem-B again for the sake of diversity.
The concept of "counter everything" died a long time ago. Several Pokemon in OU don't have any counters, so the fact that Kyurem-B has any counters in OU (and you can actually add Forretress to that list, since Kyurem-B without HP Fire can't even guarantee a 3HKO) is actually an argument against its ban. OU today is all about checks, not counters. As long as you can keep something in check, that's usually all you can ask for.
Outrage is THE MOST powerful move in the entire game. Coming off the highest attack stat in OU and getting STAB is just too good to whisk away that easily.Not to mention that having STAB Outrage isn't exactly a great advantage. Outrage is one of the worst moves in the metagame right now. Unless you're positive that you're at the point where you can sweep with it, using Outrage will put your Dragon at the risk of being killed right after since you can't switch out. If you try to run Dragon Claw to make up for that, then you're using a pretty weak STAB move. In fact, Adamant Kyurem-B's Outrage is significantly weaker than Jolly Terrakion's Close Combat, just to illustrate the power difference.
I never said that they weren't checks. And yes they are decent checks for Kyurem-B can't argue with that.Looks to me like Scizor and Breloom can guarantee a OHKO after Stealth Rock. I'd say that makes them both excellent checks, so yes, Kyurem-B does get destroyed by the most common priority in OU.
Just because it's possible to remove Stealth Rock doesn't make it a non-issue. You can argue spinners, but then I can argue spin blockers. You can argue Magic Bounce users, but then I can argue Pokemon like Terrakion who can set up Stealth Rock and scare Espeon and Xatu from switching in. And Roost isn't a dumb option, lol. It's one of the better and more common moves on Kyurem-B, especially taking into account Kyurem-B combination of offense and bulk.
Kyurem-B has had very little impact on the metagame at all. This entire argument seemed to based on the premise that stall was a great playstyle before its introduction. It wasn't. Pokemon like Terrakion, Tornadus-T, and Keldeo have done more damage to the usage of stall than Kyurem-B by a long shot.
I agree with you that everyone should've been given a chance, I just don't agree with the final decision. That it was voted overwhelmingly does not change the fact that it is a decision that was not been thought through properly.Kyurem-B was unbanned because there's no reason to ban what isn't broken. When Kyurem-B's forms were released, they were instantly sent to Ubers for fear of what they could do, but we never game them a chance. Enough people made an argument to test it, and so we did. After many OU players spent a few weeks testing Kyurem-B, they voted overwhelmingly to unban Kyurem-B (about 69% unban with only about 26% ban)..
But where exactly is the evidence that Kyurem-B is making any significant negative impact on diversity? November was Kyurem-B's first full month in OU, and during that time period there were 55 Pokemon over the OU usage cutoff. The month before, there were also 55 Pokemon over the usage cutoff. Going a little further down, there were 69 Pokemon over 2% usage (at least one in every 50 teams) in November, while in October there were only 66. I'm not really seeing anything from the stats that would indicate the Kyurem-B is hurting the usage of anything. Not like Genesect, which was proven to have crippled the usage of Pokemon like Tornadus-T and Keldeo when we tried a suspect test with a Genesect-free OU and the aforementioned Pokemon jumped to the top of the usage stats.
Sadly it is. I don't know about you, but a metagame where even Garchomp is suitable (even Rough Skin) is a metagame where that we all should revise and rethink if things may not have gone out of hand at some point.
Outrage is THE MOST powerful move in the entire game. Coming off the highest attack stat in OU and getting STAB is just too good to whisk away that easily.
So I'll tell you that I'm not a big fan of Terakion in OU. Yes Terrakion wrecks and it has the 2nd most powerful move in the entire game in its arsenal. I also figured out that you love Terakion so I understand that you don't want to see it banned, but Terakion has no real OU viable counters. Gliscor is more of a check when you look to the fact that a Swords Dance after a switch in is unstoppable so Gliscor does not qualify. However it is a decent check.
Yes SR is not a non-issue but I have the feeling that people always assume that SR will be on the field when facing a pokemon. And I would've agreed with you if it was a given but it isn't. So the argument of SR should be used in proportion.
And spinblockers are as good as non-existant. The only reliable blocker there is in OU is Jellicent and Jellicent will lose to one of the most common spinners aka Starmie. Spinning is so much easier now then it was back in gen 4. But we could go on and on forever on SR. And I believe that SR is overrated as a defence mechanism against pokemon.
And no, Roost is really dumb on Kyurem-B. It trades in too much coverage for an healing move. It’s stats are reasonable, they seem bulky. But Ice is such an awful defensive typing, Dragon typing is reasonable but unfortunately and ironically weak to Dragon so that’s not an ideal defensive typing either.
This is the part where I may have been unclear due to my focus on Kyurem-B. I was ranting about the foolish decision because Kyurem-B is literally the icing on the cake when it comes to killing stall or even bulky playstyles in the current metagame.
Yes Terrakion and Tornadus-T have killed stall for sure. I've already explained a little bit about Terrakion but I don't want to go FLAME ON in that case. Tornadus-T has none due to the fact of its sheer power combined with confusion damage that could kill of a specially defensive Jirachi for instance (yes I'm speaking from experience :c).
I'm not sure about Keldeo since it has counters and isn't as overpowered as the rest. But I agree with you that Secret Sword (and Psyshock) have put a nice dent into stall teams.
I agree with you that everyone should've been given a chance, I just don't agree with the final decision. That it was voted overwhelmingly does not change the fact that it is a decision that was not been thought through properly.
As I explained earlier, Kyurem-B is the icing on the cake. A broken cake for that matter. The stats of November are irrelevant since stall was long gone thanks to Terrakion&Co. So by diversity I meant that stall is not viable anymore thanks to all these overpowered pokemon. Bringing back Kyurem-B was just a kick when you're already done.
IMO Kyurem-B does not add any surplus value to this metagame, but it almost makes 100% sure that stall is not viable anymore. Stall is a part of the diversity of teams, and when its gone, so is the diversity. That's why I wondered why you would add a pokemon who doesn't have an impact on offensive teams while it murders the already dead stall teams of this competitive environment.
The worst thing is tho, I know for sure that Kyurem-B will not be banned again as long as this generation lasts since the tiering council is just too proud to agree that they have made a mistake, let alone that they even see that keeping these OP pokemon isn't right. In the end, I still lose.