Moving on from that point, they probably spent donations on getting some Pokemon fan to tell them what they needed to know. I really wouldn't doubt it.
Yeah, the information is all there, but where are they to begin? If you were going to make a message attack on Pokemon, you can scratch the surface and use that research to make a simple, yet narrow attack, like many religious people/groups have done. However, this attack was deep, it took a lot of information that you would have to know what to search for in order to make it deep in and of itself.Or they could have just got info of the internet.....
Probably because they want to liberate our pets from us so we'll have no animals to defend us when they break into our houses and kill our families.I think PETA has become a parody themselves. Nobody can really take them seriously any more. I love how they didn't do their research either. Team Plasma may want free Pokemon, but not for liberation. They want it to be easier to eliminate humans when they don't have Pokemon to defend them.
I'm waiting for them to say that playing Angry Birds promotes cruelty to birds and pigs. I would not put it past these nutjobs.It's too obvious, PeTA is Team Plasma in real life
The real Team Plasma making a parody of the game on where they appear, they seriously have nothing else to make up. First they make "Mario Kills Tanooki" and now this, what's next, are they going to complain about Animal Crossing? You got to be kidding me, instead of wasting money making flash games, they should use it to actually save animals.
That's Team Galactic's goal.And Team Plasma? They wanted to destroy the universe, if memory serves
Actually, supposedly PETA contracted the group that makes the games on the Adult Swim website to make this game.Yeah, the information is all there, but where are they to begin? If you were going to make a message attack on Pokemon, you can scratch the surface and use that research to make a simple, yet narrow attack, like many religious people/groups have done. However, this attack was deep, it took a lot of information that you would have to know what to search for in order to make it deep in and of itself.
For that matter, why be the poor slobs that do all the research by themselves when you can get people that have the "roadmap" to all of the Pokemon information they need?
Actually, PETA euthanizes the majority of animals they "save" or have in their custody, so no, that to them is not "constructive."P.S. Maybe next time you guys can do something constructive with your time like volunteer at an animal shelter. But you're PeTA. You won't do anything useful with your time now, will you?
Don't be fooled; this isn't some stand against a video game. It's just a publicity stunt to get attention. And it's working. When we stop giving them the time of day, they'll stop making these games.Pokemon are virtual, not real, and PETA wastes time and resources on this? Unreal.
It sounds like they are killing two birds with one stone. You get people who are good entertainers of shock value that know how to make games, and you have people that are more likely to be resourceful for this type of information about the series.Actually, supposedly PETA contracted the group that makes the games on the Adult Swim website to make this game.
Yes, PETA paid these game-makers to make this game the same way Adult Swim pays these game-makers to make games for their website. This is perfectly legal, and I was only making an observation, not criticism. If you have the money to hire someone to do things you alone cannot do, you hire them. This isn't some horrible thing that we can really fault them for, especially not when there are so many actual criticisms we can make.It sounds like they are killing two birds with one stone. You get people who are good entertainers of shock value that know how to make games, and you have people that are more likely to be resourceful for this type of information about the series.
"Contracted"? Did that involve money, or was it just an entertained thought?
My only beef with that would be that they could have paid, say, an animal pharmacy, or a no kill animal shelter for the actual benefits to animals. Now maybe this wasn't an expensive thing to make, but with advertisements, especially provoking ones, you have to know how to pick your battles. To PETA's credit, they made a very provocative advertisement that fooled some of the people, but for Pete's sake, I don't think it is fair to anybody to make a wrongful attack as a publicity stunt to bolster ego.Yes, PETA paid these game-makers to make this game the same way Adult Swim pays these game-makers to make games for their website. This is perfectly legal, and I was only making an observation, not criticism. If you have the money to hire someone to do things you alone cannot do, you hire them. This isn't some horrible thing that we can really fault them for, especially not when there are so many actual criticisms we can make.
~Psychic