well, yes and no. there is no reason you can't speculate. however when we do speculate we try to only base speculation on logic and evidence, not what we want to happen, those are wishlists
I believe this to be entirely subjective.
After all we DON'T know anything except when it does happen.
Which makes this thread pointless.
I mean the only thing we can talk about is Froakie, Fletchling, Fennekin, Dedenne, Bunnelby, Chespin, Inkay, Pumpkaboo, and Wobbuffet. And maybe some talk in regards to Pikachu and Meowth.
But look here at the first post:
This topic is basically the Kalos edition of the Next Pokémon Thread. Predict what Pokémon the characters are going to catch and/or which might evolve in the case of a capture.
How can we reasonably predict what Pokemon anyone is going to catch, if we don't know what's going to happen.
For example, WE do not know if Ash is going to get a grass type, if he does get a grass type it will either be: a Pokemon that can mega evolve, or Skiddo or Phantump, making that reasonable.
But he might not, so suggesting those Pokemon would be as some people consider, wishlists, god I hate that word.
The thing is it depends on how you predict.
I believe Ash with either get Skiddo and Phantump because he might get a grass type, because of the past generations he's always had a fire, grass, water, flying Pokemon.
That is speculation.
I want Ash with Aegislash, because WHOA it's design is nice, that is probably considered wishlists.
Considering the first post doesn't not implicitly forbid wishlists, which is quite frankly entirely subjective, I think people should be allowed to predict what they want, as long as they have a reason.
A straight up list however is probably what is probably not allowed. But add some kind of reason to your prediction and it's speculation not wishlists.
And it really is subjective, because the reasons for speculation are entirely opinion based.
If I say I want Phantump because out of the remaining 6th generation grass types, it is the most unique and most to offer Ash, that might come off as wishlist to other people, but it certainly isn't a wishlist from my perspective. Hence, it is a subjective manner.
I think people should just be left alone, if you want to argue why a Pokemon shouldn't or should be on the main cast, fine, but otherwise, there's literally no point to this thread, if people can't predict (regardless if its wishlist or speculation) what Pokemon might end up on the main cast.
Like take Lucario. There is no evidence to suggest that it will be caught by anyone on the main cast.
But there is suggestive data there to allow it to be speculated to be on the main cast, simply because it is the player's first mega evolved Pokemon within X and Y
Sure that doesn't mean it will be caught, but it is suggestive enough to be considered speculative rather than wishlist. If it was any other Pokemon I'm sure no one would be calling "wishlist" the ONLY reason why Lucario is so condemned is because of these forums and everything revolved around Ash and Lucario.
Had it been Pinsir that introduced mega evolution to the player character, then no one would be calling foul as much.
Because as I've noticed the only reason mega Lucario is being condemned, is because of all the past history of people wanting Ash with Lucario and being sick of it. No one can condemn Pinsir for the same reason because it hasn't been suggested to being with Ash since the Sinnoh Region.