• Hi all
    Just a notice, we recently discovered that someone got into a moderator account and started hard deleting a load of key and legacy threads...around 150 threads have been lost dating back to 2007 and some weeks ago so we can't roll the forums back.
    Luckily no personal data could be accessed by this moderator, and we've altered the permissions so hard deleting isn't possible in the future
    Sorry for any inconvenience with this and sorry for any lost posts.
  • Hi all. We had a couple of reports of people's signatures getting edited etc. in a bad way. You can rest assured this wasn't done by staff and nobody has compromised any of our databases.

    However, remember to keep your passwords secure. If you use similar passwords to elsewhere which has been accessed, people and even bots may be able to access your account.

    We always recommend using unique passwords, and two-factor authentication if you are able. Make sure you're as secure as possible
  • Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
  • If you're still waiting for the e-mail, be sure to check your junk/spam e-mail folders

Pokémon Bank & Poké Transporter Thread [READ FIRST POST]

Status
Not open for further replies.

0danmaster0

Well-Known Member

Bolt the Cat

Bringing the Thunder
It is free. You just need Pokemon Bank in order to use it. ;)

And back to my point about McDonald's: Should I file a compliant and/or call the police since this extortion? I want my free ranch packets back. Do you think the police and my sole complain will change what a global fast food company charges for ranch? I mean, clearly they are violently and illegally extorting money from me, if the actual definition holds true. McDonald's is intimating me to pay 25 cents for a ranch packet. I am surprised a group of elitist, free ranch packet advocates haven't stormed the halls of McDonald's Headquarters demanding ranch, while costly to produce, be free of charge for all customers. I don't like how McDonald's is threatening me. Clearly a case of old-fashioned extortion.

Your McDonalds example, now that I think about it, isn't quite accurate. Let me revise it for you. Let's say instead you have to pay 25 cents for Ranch AND Provolone Cheese. And even if you only wanted one or the other, you still have to pay the 25 cents. Anyway, what if you just wanted the Ranch? You have no problem paying 25 cents for the Provolone, that's expensive stuff. But you don't want the Provolone, you want the Ranch, which comes in these bulk packets (I don't remember if McDonalds actually does this, but I know Chick-Fil-A does, so let's just say they do for the sake of argument) that they should have no problem giving away for free. So it's a ripoff.

Anyway, as for your question, that would be a bit of an overraction, but at the very least, it's worth complaining about to the manager/corporate/whoever has the power to change it.

All cloud storage programs cost money. It cost a lot of money to maintain these huge servers. Five dollars is laughable when you think about a YEARLY fee. That's less money then a monthly 8$ Netflix subscription.

I think its a genius idea, and I will gladly fork over five dollars a year to them. They knew they had to make cross-gen transferring happen this generation and they got it to work. I don't get what's the big deal with paying an annual fee. They are even giving a long free-trial period for it.

See the analogy I posted above. Charging you for something that's traditionally free subtracts value from the game, since you're not getting as much content out of the game for the same price. It's Day One DLC, they charge you extra for game content that's already part of the game.
 

Serebii

And, as if by magic, the webmaster appeared...
Staff member
Admin
Your McDonalds example, now that I think about it, isn't quite accurate. Let me revise it for you. Let's say instead you have to pay 25 cents for Ranch AND Provolone Cheese. And even if you only wanted one or the other, you still have to pay the 25 cents. Anyway, what if you just wanted the Ranch? You have no problem paying 25 cents for the Provolone, that's expensive stuff. But you don't want the Provolone, you want the Ranch, which comes in these bulk packets (I don't remember if McDonalds actually does this, but I know Chick-Fil-A does, so let's just say they do for the sake of argument) that they should have no problem giving away for free. So it's a ripoff.

Anyway, as for your question, that would be a bit of an overraction, but at the very least, it's worth complaining about to the manager/corporate/whoever has the power to change it.



See the analogy I posted above. Charging you for something that's traditionally free subtracts value from the game, since you're not getting as much content out of the game for the same price. It's Day One DLC, they charge you extra for game content that's already part of the game.

For one, it's not day one...
 

EverChanger

エヴァーチェンジャー
Just get Pokémon Bank on your 3DS, and you can share the boxes between your two games, and easily "trade" between your two games without the need of a second console

Or a second "dummy" Pokémon, for that matter.
 
Wait, so this will be the only way to transfer pokemon? I thought it'd be a handy tool like Pokemon Box was.
Well I guess I'll have to buy it then. Never did online purchases though so I'll have to activate that option in my bank and stuff. 5 bucks isn't a lot but it's pretty crappy that they charge money for something that used to be free.
 

Endolise

TengenToppaBoogaloo
but it's pretty crappy that they charge money for something that used to be free.

They could have just not let players transfer their Pokémon at all, and they said that trying to get the 3DS to work with the DS was tricky, so if this is the solution that they came up with, then this is the solution that they came up with. Mind you, transferring Pokémon is an optional feature and not one that you are obligated to use.

This is a better solution in the long run, because they can continue to use the Bank for later installments even after they've moved on from X and Y.
 

Ditto24

Well-Known Member
See the analogy I posted above. Charging you for something that's traditionally free subtracts value from the game, since you're not getting as much content out of the game for the same price. It's Day One DLC, they charge you extra for game content that's already part of the game.

But this isn't the same as the transfer to Gen V. Essentially yes the same thing does happen and you can have your older pokemon back, but Bank offers you so much more, 3000 spaces, it gives new life to the Gen V games as well coz you can restart them over and over. Cloud stuff as mentioned before has always cost and it's only natural for GF and Nintendo to do it.

GF didn't have to do this, it's a fantastic feature and for the money their asking for...it's an absolute bargain.
 

mjunior3

Link Jokers!
I'm just hoping that you can transfer without this, because I seriously doubt I'll need a space for 3,000 freaking Pokemon, lol. I don't have the time to catch/ breed that many anyway, lol. :/
 
They could have just not let players transfer their Pokémon at all, and they said that trying to get the 3DS to work with the DS was tricky, so if this is the solution that they came up with, then this is the solution that they came up with. Mind you, transferring Pokémon is an optional feature and not one that you are obligated to use.

This is a better solution in the long run, because they can continue to use the Bank for later installments even after they've moved on from X and Y.

Yes, I know I'm not obligated to use it. But saving about 10 years of work and an entire dex in my box is worth 5 bucks so I'll use it.
And well, I'm glad they didn't do the same like they did between gen 2 and 3, that really sucked.

Still, I don't see why it's so difficult to make a DS connect to a 3DS. I mean, it's them who make the hardware.
 

Ditto24

Well-Known Member
Still, I don't see why it's so difficult to make a DS connect to a 3DS. I mean, it's them who make the hardware.

No ones batting an eye at PS4 and XboxOne not being backwards compatible. It was expected, I think it should be the same for Nintendo.
 

Takaru

Werk, Werk, Werk
See the analogy I posted above. Charging you for something that's traditionally free subtracts value from the game, since you're not getting as much content out of the game for the same price. It's Day One DLC, they charge you extra for game content that's already part of the game.

They are charging you for the cloud storage, and as always extra storage space for Pokemon has always cost extra money, much more then what they are charging now actually. Cloud storage payments usually go around 5~10$ a month. So they are being more then generous by only charging an annual fee of 5$.

Poke-Transfer is still free, but you need Poke Bank to use it, which I can see why someone would see the burden in it. I don't know anything about programming or the limitations the 3DS has with backwards compatibility concerning transferring. So I can't say if there would have been another solution for this. They are offering a free trail for it too, with more then enough time to transfer all your Pokemon onto your game and never use it.

This seems to be the method they are using to ensure that they never encounter the problem that happened with Gen III, and its cloud storage that's always going to have your Pokemon, offered at a very cheap price. If you ask me, five dollars is nothing to fret over.
 

Serebii

And, as if by magic, the webmaster appeared...
Staff member
Admin
Wait, so this will be the only way to transfer pokemon? I thought it'd be a handy tool like Pokemon Box was.
Well I guess I'll have to buy it then. Never did online purchases though so I'll have to activate that option in my bank and stuff. 5 bucks isn't a lot but it's pretty crappy that they charge money for something that used to be free.

It is a handy tool like Pokémon Box.
 

PMG

Pokemon Master Gaz
No ones batting an eye at PS4 and XboxOne not being backwards compatible. It was expected, I think it should be the same for Nintendo.

plus this will be compatible with future titles

I cant wait to start storing Pokémon also £5? a year is nothing I pay £8.99 per month to play World of Warcraft
 

mjunior3

Link Jokers!
It is a handy tool like Pokémon Box.

OMG, I GET TO QUOTE SEREBII HIMSELF! xD jk

But anyway, I really wish I had gotten Pokemon box, because trading fodders for everything on the games vs. sending them to a transfer tool, but the only problem I could have with this is someone hacking into the Cloud, and deleting everything. *Shudders at the thought*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top