0danmaster0
Well-Known Member
It's only $5? Wow, that's a great price.
5$ a year yeah
It's only $5? Wow, that's a great price.
It is free. You just need Pokemon Bank in order to use it.
And back to my point about McDonald's: Should I file a compliant and/or call the police since this extortion? I want my free ranch packets back. Do you think the police and my sole complain will change what a global fast food company charges for ranch? I mean, clearly they are violently and illegally extorting money from me, if the actual definition holds true. McDonald's is intimating me to pay 25 cents for a ranch packet. I am surprised a group of elitist, free ranch packet advocates haven't stormed the halls of McDonald's Headquarters demanding ranch, while costly to produce, be free of charge for all customers. I don't like how McDonald's is threatening me. Clearly a case of old-fashioned extortion.
All cloud storage programs cost money. It cost a lot of money to maintain these huge servers. Five dollars is laughable when you think about a YEARLY fee. That's less money then a monthly 8$ Netflix subscription.
I think its a genius idea, and I will gladly fork over five dollars a year to them. They knew they had to make cross-gen transferring happen this generation and they got it to work. I don't get what's the big deal with paying an annual fee. They are even giving a long free-trial period for it.
Your McDonalds example, now that I think about it, isn't quite accurate. Let me revise it for you. Let's say instead you have to pay 25 cents for Ranch AND Provolone Cheese. And even if you only wanted one or the other, you still have to pay the 25 cents. Anyway, what if you just wanted the Ranch? You have no problem paying 25 cents for the Provolone, that's expensive stuff. But you don't want the Provolone, you want the Ranch, which comes in these bulk packets (I don't remember if McDonalds actually does this, but I know Chick-Fil-A does, so let's just say they do for the sake of argument) that they should have no problem giving away for free. So it's a ripoff.
Anyway, as for your question, that would be a bit of an overraction, but at the very least, it's worth complaining about to the manager/corporate/whoever has the power to change it.
See the analogy I posted above. Charging you for something that's traditionally free subtracts value from the game, since you're not getting as much content out of the game for the same price. It's Day One DLC, they charge you extra for game content that's already part of the game.
What if you have both x and y what do you get then?
Just get Pokémon Bank on your 3DS, and you can share the boxes between your two games, and easily "trade" between your two games without the need of a second console
but it's pretty crappy that they charge money for something that used to be free.
Just get Pokémon Bank on your 3DS, and you can share the boxes between your two games, and easily "trade" between your two games without the need of a second console
See the analogy I posted above. Charging you for something that's traditionally free subtracts value from the game, since you're not getting as much content out of the game for the same price. It's Day One DLC, they charge you extra for game content that's already part of the game.
They could have just not let players transfer their Pokémon at all, and they said that trying to get the 3DS to work with the DS was tricky, so if this is the solution that they came up with, then this is the solution that they came up with. Mind you, transferring Pokémon is an optional feature and not one that you are obligated to use.
This is a better solution in the long run, because they can continue to use the Bank for later installments even after they've moved on from X and Y.
Still, I don't see why it's so difficult to make a DS connect to a 3DS. I mean, it's them who make the hardware.
See the analogy I posted above. Charging you for something that's traditionally free subtracts value from the game, since you're not getting as much content out of the game for the same price. It's Day One DLC, they charge you extra for game content that's already part of the game.
Wait, so this will be the only way to transfer pokemon? I thought it'd be a handy tool like Pokemon Box was.
Well I guess I'll have to buy it then. Never did online purchases though so I'll have to activate that option in my bank and stuff. 5 bucks isn't a lot but it's pretty crappy that they charge money for something that used to be free.
No ones batting an eye at PS4 and XboxOne not being backwards compatible. It was expected, I think it should be the same for Nintendo.
It is a handy tool like Pokémon Box.
Might not your Pokemon be a little unsafe stored on the Internet though?
It is a handy tool like Pokémon Box.