I don't get why people keep saying "Real leaks can have fake information in it too". I mean, what is the difference for me, the player, between a fake leak and a real leak with unreliable information?
So, I look at the Alola leak and think "Ok, this one may be right, but some of those infos may not be accurate. I don't know which ones and how inaccurate they can be. So the 'Bug/Psychic Butterfree' may be an exact 'Bug/Psychic Butterfree', may be a 'Bug/Somethingelse Butterfree', may be even a 'Bug/Psychic Venomoth', or it can be nothing at all and this bit of information may be totally wrong".
I will only know which parts are accurate after I get confirmation of the same said parts through official reveals (a point where the leak ceases to have a meaning anyway).
So... how is that any different from a fake leak? If I can't trust the content of a leak, if I don't know which parts are fake, the varying degrees of lack of accuracy, etc, how is it any different from a completely fake leak that can end up being right in one or two things out of luck?
I'm not being ironic here, I really don't see what is the difference and why so many people are so eager to defend leaks based on that. To me it's like discussing semantics.