Yes, that’s sometimes how it works. Certainly not as if they have the ability to see who was doing that, and who was behaving themselves. It is unfortunate when consequences for the actions of some are visited on the many, isn’t it?
You are not teaching me anything new here, I know this happens in many video games. I just don't agree with GF's way of handling this and think they shouldn't punish their honest customers for the actions of a few.
Yes
This is contradictory. They are patched in because it is definitely not more difficult to hack them. Why exactly do you think they chose to start omitting the Pokémon from the base game and later patching it in to a purpose-left empty slot? Within hours of a game or DLC releasing, we have people decompiling the code and telling us what lies within. I think the best people are doing it out of desire for knowledge and not malice or cheating, but still.
No, you just don't get what I was saying. Now that they leave the empty slots and patch in the Pokemon later the danger of people hacking the Pokemon
before they are patched in is more is less prevalent.
Like imagine they are releasing a free DLC/Patch that's literally just a small area where you can catch Zarude (and the data of Zarude is added in this patch). It's accessible via Corviknight taxi at any point in the story. Since Zarude's data is added in this patch, and it's catchable as soon as you download the patch, there is no way for anybody to get it "too early". Sure people might still hack them, but at that point it would not be different than any other hacked Pokemon.
With this possibility in place, I feel adding the Pokemon to the game via patches and allowing us to catch them would be preferable to shaving them at us as presents. (It's "Catch 'em all!" not "Getting 'em all as gifts")
Again you are not telling me anything new here, I'm one of the people who actively waits for the datamine with each new Pokemon generation.