In my opinion the legend what Sneasel is based on grows and matures into a form that looks like Weavile. So no, I don't have a problem with that... even if I am keeping my Sneasel army.syvarris said:in my opnion sneasel did'nt exaclty need an evo like weavile but sneasel was fine without it dunsparce is just as good aslo i read the rant thread raised one a pwn my friends mewtwo after ten battles
SPINDAS NOT USELESS, and if they did give them evos it would prolly look wierd... but i think Cherrimu, Perap and Pachirisu should have evos!! im sure thay can make a giant squirrel and flower and bird (b/c they always look the same when they evolve)
noelspandas said:But i think the first generation pokemon shouldnt haave gotten a new one... well i like magmar's, but like magniton's he shouldnt have 1... he looks the exact same, and same with tangela!!!
absol shouldnt envolve in my opinion i dont find any sense on it
Absol doesn't evolve. Arseus is a seperate Pokemon altogether.
Absol should stay a standalone though IMO, and same with Skarmory. A baby version of that would be pointless, and an evolution would be almost broken. Skarm is already an amazing Pokemon.
Pokemon that should have been and would've been good standalones:
Lucario, Dorapion, Cherimu, Chimecho, Wobbuffet, Yanma, Tangela, and Gligar.
What are we suppose to discuss, pokemon that shouldnt have gotten an evo or something, that could have gone in the pre evo/evo discussion thread.
Licki shouldnt have evolved (so damn ugly!)