• Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
  • If you're still waiting for the e-mail, be sure to check your junk/spam e-mail folders

Ps3 Idea != Wii Idea; Ps3 =computer

Grammer

RUH OH!!!111
according to Phil Harrison.
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6152133.html

which is retarded.

When Sony revealed the PlayStation 3 controller would be able to sense certain types of motion, skeptics scoffed. That's because Nintendo announced last September that its recently rechristened Wii console would also have motion-sensing controls, leading many to believe that Sony had added the functionality at the last minute as a gimmick. A report in the New York Times didn't help, as it said that some of Sony's own developers were not given the PS3 controller's tilt-sensitive controller until just weeks prior to its unveiling at the Electronic Entertainment Expo 2006 in May.



Now, Sony has come out swinging. In this week's edition of German magazine Der Spiegel, Phil Harrison, president of Sony Computer Entertainment's Worldwide Studios, aggressively denied his company appropriated the motion-sensing idea from Nintendo. "In a certain way, I understand why people would say [such things November. In particular, he said the Linux-based operating system on the console's hard drive will have enough processing power and nongaming functionalities to render traditional PCs--most of which use a form of Microsoft's Windows OS--moot in the home. "We believe that the PS3 will be the place where our users play games, watch films, browse the Web, and use other [home] computer fun], but it is stupid, if you'll forgive me saying so," said Harrison.

Harrison went on to say that the PS3's motion-sensitive controller had been in the works for some time. "We have already worked on it a long time, and Nintendo almost certainly has done likewise with something similar," he said. "It is perfectly natural for two companies to work on [nearly] identical devices. It's like that with technology." He reiterated that the PlayStation 2's Dual Shock controller is the "de facto-industry standard for video games...We define the standard for the man-machine interface for playing games."

Besides defending the PS3, Harrison took time to evangelize the device, which will launch worldwide thisctions," said Harrison. "The PlayStation 3 is a computer. We do not need the PC."
 
Last edited:

Paradox

Irate Pirate
Harrison went on to say that the PS3's motion-sensitive controller had been in the works for some time. "We have already worked on it a long time, and Nintendo almost certainly has done likewise with something similar," he said.
Of course Harrison, that's why you had told almost no developers about it. They said themselves is was a far from finished product, the sensors hadn't been refined. Doesn't sound like it's been in development for long
 

Swampy

Crack the Skye
Paradox said:
Of course Harrison, that's why you had told almost no developers about it. They said themselves is was a far from finished product, the sensors hadn't been refined. Doesn't sound like it's been in development for long
At least Sony is trying to cover their asses...

which is retarded.
I agree. =/
 

Bulk

Well-Known Member
Sony are blatently lieing and calling people stupid for stating the obviouse is going to get them no votes. And PC's will overtake the PS3 in graphic terms in only a year and a bit. As PC's are comstantly being upgraded, unless Sony make people buy a new graphics card every year they can't keep up. And if they do that, they're just stupid.
 

Moonlight.

Well-Known Member
Sure, they've been working on it for time. So why have they gone with a completely different controller until the last minute, months after Nintendo reveals that they are using motion sensors? They're so bad at lying this isn't even funny...

BTW, I don't know HOW Sony expects to sell their console by making it so expensive AND having motion sensors that are below mediocre compared to the Wii's...
 
Last edited:

The Power of Pika

Way Past Cool!!
Computer?
Wait a minute according to history game consoles were made to make a cheaper option for a computer and also not be totally like a computer and focus on fewer things.

So now the game console has to be like a computer in this day and age?

If Phil Harrison really wants his console to be up on par with a computer then why doesn't he go into the actual computer industry instead of the game industry. Boy he's not good at lying with the rest of his statements is he? =P
 

Swampy

Crack the Skye
Ohtachi said:
Of course the PS3 needs defending and praising. PS3 won't be replacing nothing, except empty space on store shelves.
Oh, you mean like the PSP? I'm almost 100% sure you meant the PS3 will be following in the PSP's footsteps....
 
Top