R/S/E v.s. FR/LG

[darksonicjedi]

I prefered r/s/e but really liked fr/lg too

 

[Ursafan]

Gym Leaders that are actually hard - R/S/E had tough Gym Leaders like Flannery, Norman, Winona. Those were hard battles, with that Torkoal spamming Attract, and that Slaking, and that goddamn Altaria.

Did you just say that Slaking was hard?!? It is super easy if you use a pelliper that knows protect. just protect whenever it can attack.

 

[Pokemon4Ever]

It's a close one when comparing RS to FRLG, but Emerald owns them all, so RSE gets my vote. FRLG are good games, but bad as remakes imo. RS's only major flaws comes from its somewhat low replay value, lack of Kanto and Johto Pokemon, and the omission of the time of day. Otherwise, I love the Hoenn region and Emerald was all I could have asked for in a remake of two otherwise fine games.

 

[denizenofevil]

FR/LG . Those were the games that redeemed the third generation for me. I disliked everything else.

 

[Night Avenger]

Emerald. And just Emerald, not Ruby/Sapphire.

FireRed/LeafGreen were awesome but kinda slow, I dunno.

 

[The Seer]

FG/LG was pretty good but R/S/E was better

 

[Zorkzedork]

I liked FR better but I would have liked it more if they added more new features(Contests,Secret Bases, More 2vs2 Battles etc.)

 

[Agonist]

Emerald. And just Emerald, not Ruby/Sapphire.

FireRed/LeafGreen were awesome but kinda slow, I dunno.

same here, and yeah fr/lg were good but they seemed to lack the quality of the hoenn, if you know what i mean

 

[SparklingMistral]

R/S/E because it was something new. FR/LG just seemed the same to me, minus the Sevii Islands.

 

[kiogrey]

I still prefer R/S/E beacuse it had more variety in enviroments.
FR/LG was good, but I kinda got lost in what to do after the Pokemon Tower in Lavender. IMO, Kanto routes are kinda... bland and same-looking all region round.

 

[Lufiji]

R/S/E, easily. FR/LG felt really out-dated to me, the sprites didn't look as good as R/S/E's, (most of) the music wasn't as good as R/S/E's and I felt that the game went alot slower than R/S/E as well.

Not to mention R/S/E's far superior environments and the battle tower.

 

[bulber]

I loved r/s/e, but my heart goes to fr/lg. They were amazing remakes and they left me in anticipation for Hg/Ss. I think I'll like HG/SS more than D/P/Pt.

 

[pokman]

I liked the R/S/E pokemon alot more.

Although, FR/LG seemed less bland route/land-wise to me.

 

[Relinquish]

R/S/E, new and more pokemon.

 

[.:Alex:.]

FR/LG are fun while they last, but they are super dull once everything is seen and done.

 

[Narutopokedude]

Hmm, my most favorite games compared to my least favorite games...

R/S/E all the way.

 

[Jibakushin]

I like R/S/E more than FR/LG because there was more to do other than battling like contests and decorating secert bases.

 

[K-os]

FRLG was a bit dull.

 

[Sir-Aero]

R/S/E Indeed! Though we got the Gen 1 nostalgia in FR/LG there just wasn't enough post-game features to enjoy.

 

[Skull_Kid]

No matter how much i like Kanto, the remakes were not as awesome as emerald was, so, my vote goes to RSE.
The lack of contests and berry planting was a major failure in FR/LG