So basically, an NYPD cop broke his own rules by illegally choking Eric Garner to death all over allegedly selling individual cigarettes despite shouting that he can't breathe. It was all caught on video and it was ruled by the medical examiner as a homicide. And how does the Grand Jury responds? NO INDICTMENT! Oh Staten Island, may God have mercy on your souls.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/04/n...land-chokehold-death-of-eric-garner.html?_r=0
You keep using the word "illegal." The chokehold was not illegal. It was not against the law. It was against department policy. There is a difference.
And a homicide ruling only means that his death was caused by another person. Not that it was a murder.
Self defense cases are ruled homicides because the person defending themselves caused the death of the subject. They aren't prosecuted as murders. Suicide, accidental, homicide, natural and unknown are the 5 standard rulings.
The officer still faces punishment from his department and if the family sues him, he will probably lose.
Edit: I was surprised. I thought that they would go for manslaughter in the second. Call the chokehold reckless or something. I hope to see more information on why this wasn't set to trial when it really should have been.
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/12/...cop-who-used-chokehold-in-eric-garners-death/
Last edited: