Lust for power
Come on, I wont bite
To above poster:
the Ivysaur, Pikachu and Beedrill ones, I had posted them already.
The others I've seen.
the Ivysaur, Pikachu and Beedrill ones, I had posted them already.
The others I've seen.
-
Hi all. We have had reports of member's signatures being edited to include malicious content. You can rest assured this wasn't done by staff and we can find no indication that the forums themselves have been compromised.
However, remember to keep your passwords secure. If you use similar logins on multiple sites, people and even bots may be able to access your account.
We always recommend using unique passwords and enable two-factor authentication if possible. Make sure you are secure. -
Be sure to join the discussion on our discord at: Discord.gg/serebii
Realistic Pokemon Artwork
- Thread starter Magnus64
- Start date
- Status
Blue_Ditto_256
Fail on a Stick
There's a thread in Smogon like this: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42415 People made their own "realistic" Pokemon out of things they had at hand.
Cryptozoologist
Banned
Those are all extremely amateurish.
Pax O'Brien
I Has a Pink Party!
I think Rapidash is the easiest pokemon to make realistic.
Hoothoot actually looks like... well, Hoothoot. My favorite.
Cryptozoologist
Banned
This is why Pokemon would suck in the real world.
shadowkami
Internet Hustla'
Yup...Confirms my beliefs... There are already enough bizarre organisims already.
X502XedgeX
help me team build
all of the ones that are photoshoped are really stupid, but the drawings are cool
if pokemon were real though, i dont think that they would resemble a life like shape, because first of all, something thats runnig around and has powers, could probaly find away to look different as well,
we will never know what they will look like in real life, but if i had to imange it, they would look as close to the games and show as possible,
no a bunch of wrinkley turtles and lizards, and mewtwo wouldnt have fur,
if pokemon were real though, i dont think that they would resemble a life like shape, because first of all, something thats runnig around and has powers, could probaly find away to look different as well,
we will never know what they will look like in real life, but if i had to imange it, they would look as close to the games and show as possible,
no a bunch of wrinkley turtles and lizards, and mewtwo wouldnt have fur,
I found this shockingly realistic one
http://everyonesname.deviantart.com/art/cyndaquil-15279061
http://everyonesname.deviantart.com/art/cyndaquil-15279061
DarkLegend
The Grand Draconian
In an alternate universe where Pokemon is the highest grossing M rated television and movie series of all time. People gather and draw cartoon versions of Pokemon and debate whether or not pokemon should be more kid friendly
I love the 3 (demon) dragons the most
I think you would lose your mind by just looking them in the eye
I love the 3 (demon) dragons the most
I think you would lose your mind by just looking them in the eye
PokemonHero
I can see the future
Croagunk looks quite awesome, albeit a little small.
EDIT:
Cute Eevee pics.
Last edited:
shadowkami
Internet Hustla'
That croagunk is completely epic. But shouldn't that croagunk be atleast a bullfrog or something?
Croagunk looks quite awesome, albeit a little small.
EDIT:
Cute Eevee pics.
PokemonHero
I can see the future
Croagunk's supposed to be based off of poison dart frogs, so it makes perfect sense really.
RaZoR LeAf
Night Terror
How exactly are the photoshopped ones 'really stupid'? If they looked as close to the games and cartoon as possible, they would either be 12 pixels high or with flat colours and be walking breathing cartoons. Hardly realistic, when was the last time you saw a cartoon character walking down the streets? Who Framed Roger Rabbit is not the epitome of realism.
LegendaryRotom
Well-Known Member
Realistic Cressi
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/5995/cressiyx4.jpg
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/5995/cressiyx4.jpg
X502XedgeX
help me team build
pokemon, are based off animals, or so it looks, but their not animals, so it dosnent make real sense to take real animal pics and photoshop them to look like pokemon,
and if anyone with an imigantion read my post, they would understand that we wouldnt have cartoons running around, but they would look like the cartoons, not like real animals just spray painted and altered,
RaZoR LeAf
Night Terror
How can you imagine a pokemon without thinking of the animal it's based on? Pidgey is a bird. Birds are animals. Croagunk is a frog. A frog is an animal. If pokemon aren't animals, then you have to say Pidgey is a Pidgey, it is not a bird. Magikarp is not a fish. Persian is not a persian cat. Now someone photoshopped a Weezing (and if you look at Worth1000 instead of stolen images in random photobucket albums you'll find it) and made it a purple blob with eyes and a grin on it. Or Geodude as a big rock with real human arms and a funny face. It looks idiotic and completely unrealistic. Realism is based on our understanding of what things are. If you watch a TV show with poor effects, you think "well i can see the joins on the skin and where the selotape is holding things together that's so fake" then you don't think realism. If you watch something and then later find out half of it was CGI, then it did it's job. You found it so realistic that you didn't know it wasn't.
Pokemon aren't real, we all know that. But if you want something to look real, it has to have some grounding in reality first. Of course in these cases, it depends entirely on how good you are at photoshop and how long you get to spend making the image. All the Worth1000 images have a deadline, they only have 48 hours from the time the contest is announced to when it goes into voting. If you've never seen pokemon before, it's not a lot of time to really think about making it look realistic.
http://razorleaf.deviantart.com/art/Houndoom-58150758
http://razorleaf.deviantart.com/art/Torkoal-58151016
These took several days to get looking right. Houndoom could probably do with more shading on the horns, looking back on it now, they look to placed on and are lacking reflection from the fur coat.
Also, everyone has imagination, that's the entire message of the thread.
Last edited:
Cryptozoologist
Banned
That face is completely different from Cresselia's real face. It's unnaturally angry.
- Status